Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36707838›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2023

Gunshot injury to the colon by expanding bullets in combat patients wounded in hybrid period of the Russian-Ukrainian war during 2014-2020.

Kostiantyn Gumeniuk, Igor A Lurin, Ievgen Tsema, Lesia Malynovska, Maksym Gorobeiko, Andrii Dinets

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Persistent neuropathic pain symptoms after FPV drone-related thoracic blast injury without rib fractures: a pilot observational study from the Ukraine War.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Assault rifle injuries in civilians: ballistics of wound patterns, assessment and initial management.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kostiantyn GumeniukMedical Forces Command, Armed Forces of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Igor A LurinNational Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Ievgen TsemaDepartment of Surgery, Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Lesia MalynovskaDepartment of Surgery, Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Maksym GorobeikoDepartment of Surgery, Institute of Biology and Medicine, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Demiїvska 13, Kyiv, 03039, Ukraine.
Andrii DinetsDepartment of Surgery, Institute of Biology and Medicine, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Demiїvska 13, Kyiv, 03039, Ukraine. andrii.dinets@knu.ua.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA gunshot wound to the colon is a frequent injury in armed conflicts. An example of a high-energy modern weapon is hollow-point bullets, which is associated with increased tissue damage and lethal outcome. The aim of this study was to evaluate gunshot injuries to the colon in combat patients and to assess the difference in clinical features of patients with colon injuries by hollow-point versus shape-stable bullets. PATIENTS AND

methodsAnalyses of clinical data were performed on 374 male soldiers from the Armed Forces of Ukraine with gunshot abdominal wounds with injury to the colon in East Ukraine between 2014 and 2020. Out of 374 injured, 112 (29.9%) patients were diagnosed with penetrating gunshot bullet wounds: 69/112 (61.6%) were injured by shape-stable bullets, and the hollow-point bullets injured 43/112 (38.4%) patients.

resultsMore severe hemorrhagic shock stages were in patients injured by hollow-point bullets: shock stages III-IV was in 25 (58.1%) patients injured by the hollow-point bullets vs. 17 (24.6%) patients injured by shape-stable bullets (p = 0.0004). Left colon parts were more frequently injured as compared to the right colon side or transverse colon: 21 (48.8%) patients were injured by the hollow-point bullets (p < 0.0001), and 41 (59.4%) patients were injured by the shape-stable bullets (p = 0.032). A significant difference was identified for the frequent injury to the middle colon within the entire cohort (p = 0.023). Patients injured by the hollow-point bullets demonstrated a higher frequency of 3-5 areas of colon gunshot defects, which was detected in 18 (41.8%) patients injured by hollow-point bullets and none with shape-stable bullets injury (p = 0.0001). Colon Injury Scale (CIS) IV was detected in 7 (16.3%) patients injured by the hollow-point bullets as compared to 2 (2.9%) patients injured by shape-stable bullets (p = 0.011). Colostomy was performed in 14 (69%) patients injured by shape-stable bullets and in 12 (27.9%) patients injured by hollow-point bullets (p > 0.05). 15 (35%) patients died after injury by the hollow-point bullet, whereas 9 (13%) patients after damage by the shape-stable bullets (p = 0.0089).

conclusionsAll patients should be suspected to have an injury by bullet with expanding properties in case of penetrating abdominal injury (absent of outlet wound) and careful revision of the abdomen must be performed to identify possible multiorgan injury as well as multiple gunshot defects of the intestine.

Indexed as

Abdominal InjuriesThoracic InjuriesWounds, GunshotColonHumansMaleRussiaColon injuryExpanding bulletGunshotHollow-point bulletShape-stable bulletsWar in Ukraine

Identifiers

PMID36707838
PMCPMC9883919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.