Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36707782›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2023

Diagnosis and management of keratoconus by eye care practitioners in Kenya.

Zahra Aly Rashid, Vanessa R Moodley, Khathutshelo Percy Mashige

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis: A Systematic Review.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Retinoscopes: Past and present.World journal of methodology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zahra Aly RashidSchool of Health Sciences, Discipline of Optometry, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X54001, Durban, 4000, South Africa. alyzahra@gmail.com.
Vanessa R MoodleySchool of Health Sciences, Discipline of Optometry, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X54001, Durban, 4000, South Africa.
Khathutshelo Percy MashigeSchool of Health Sciences, Discipline of Optometry, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X54001, Durban, 4000, South Africa.
University of KwaZulu-Natal · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo explore current eye care practice in keratoconus diagnosis and management in Kenya.

methodsAn online questionnaire was distributed to ophthalmic clinical officers (OCO) and optometrists.

resultsA total of 203 responses were received from 52 OCOs and 151 optometrists with a response rate of 24.4% and 53.5% respectively. The majority reported having access to retinoscopes (88.5%; p = 0.48) and slit lamps (76.7; p = 0.14). Few practitioners had access to a corneal topographer (13.5%; p = 0.08) and rigid contact lens (CL) fitting sets (OCOs 5.8%, optometrists 33.8%; p < 0.01). One-third did not feel that retinoscopy (38.7%; p = 0.21), slit lamp findings (30.3%; p = 0.10) and corneal topography (36.6%; p = 0.39) are important investigations in keratoconus diagnosis. Corneal topography was not recommended in two-thirds of patients (59.0%; p = 0.33) with vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC). The majority counselled against eye rubbing in mild (73.6%; p = 0.90) VKC, 52.9% in moderate (p = 0.40) and 43.6% in severe (p = 0.24) cases. The majority prescribed spectacles in mild (90.2%; p = 0.95), 29% (p = 0.97) in moderate and 1.9% (p = 0.05) in severe cases. When the binocular best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) with spectacles was ≤ 6/18, 76.9% of OCOs and 58.9% of optometrists referred for CLs (p = 0.02). When binocular BCVA with CLs dropped to ≤ 6/18, 83.7% (p = 0.18) referred to the ophthalmologist for surgical intervention. Few OCOs fitted rigid CLs (15.4% OCOs, 51.0% optometrists; p = 0.01), majority referred to optometrists (82.7% OCOs, 43.7% optometrists; p < 0.01). Progression was monitored in 70.1% (p = 0.11) of mild, 50.9% (p = 0.54) moderate and 25.3% (p = 0.31) advanced cases. Few OCOs (15.4%) performed corneal cross-linking (CXL). A few respondents (5.4%; p = 0.13) did not know when to refer keratoconus patients for CXL. Co-management with ophthalmologists was reported by 58.0% (p = 0.06) of respondents.

conclusionThe results of this study highlight the need to map services for keratoconus patients, review current curricula and continuous education priorities for mid-level ophthalmic workers, develop guidelines for the diagnosis and management of keratoconus and improve interdisciplinary collaboration.

Indexed as

Conjunctivitis, AllergicKeratoconusCorneal TopographyCross-Linking ReagentsHumansKenyaPhotosensitizing AgentsRiboflavinVisual AcuityCross-Linking ReagentsPhotosensitizing AgentsRiboflavinAfricaeye-care guidelinesKenyaKeratoconusOphthalmic clinical officersOptometristVernal keratoconjunctivitis

Identifiers

PMID36707782
PMCPMC9881246
OpenAlexW4318219017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.