Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36707664›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Continuous intraoperative perfusion monitoring of free microvascular anastomosed fasciocutaneous flaps using remote photoplethysmography.

Sebastian P Schraven, Benjamin Kossack, Daniel Strüder, Maximillian Jung, Lotte Skopnik, Justus Gross, Anna Hilsmann, Peter Eisert, Robert Mlynski, Eric L Wisotzky

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Correlation between systemic blood pressure and free flap perfusion: A photoplethysmography study.GMS Interdisciplinary plastic and reconstructive surgery DGPW · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Intraoperative imaging during head and neck reconstruction.Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sebastian P Schraven *Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery "Otto Körner", Rostock University Medical Center, Doberaner Straße 137-139, 18057, Rostock, Germany. sebastian.schraven@med.uni-rostock.de.
Benjamin Kossack *Vision and Imaging Technologies, Fraunhofer Heinrich Hertz Institute HHI, Einsteinufer 37, 10587, Berlin, Germany. benjamin.kossack@hhi.fraunhofer.de.
Daniel StrüderDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery "Otto Körner", Rostock University Medical Center, Doberaner Straße 137-139, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Maximillian JungDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery "Otto Körner", Rostock University Medical Center, Doberaner Straße 137-139, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Lotte SkopnikDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery "Otto Körner", Rostock University Medical Center, Doberaner Straße 137-139, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Justus GrossDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic, Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, Rostock University Medical Center, Schillingallee 35, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Anna HilsmannVision and Imaging Technologies, Fraunhofer Heinrich Hertz Institute HHI, Einsteinufer 37, 10587, Berlin, Germany.
Peter EisertVision and Imaging Technologies, Fraunhofer Heinrich Hertz Institute HHI, Einsteinufer 37, 10587, Berlin, Germany.
Robert MlynskiDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery "Otto Körner", Rostock University Medical Center, Doberaner Straße 137-139, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Eric L WisotzkyDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery "Otto Körner", Rostock University Medical Center, Doberaner Straße 137-139, 18057, Rostock, Germany. eric.wisotzky@hhi.fraunhofer.de.
University of Rostock · DEFraunhofer Institute for Telecommunications, Heinrich Hertz Institute · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flap loss through limited perfusion remains a major complication in reconstructive surgery. Continuous monitoring of perfusion will facilitate early detection of insufficient perfusion. Remote or imaging photoplethysmography (rPPG/iPPG) as a non-contact, non-ionizing, and non-invasive monitoring technique provides objective and reproducible information on physiological parameters. The aim of this study is to establish rPPG for intra- and postoperative monitoring of flap perfusion in patients undergoing reconstruction with free fasciocutaneous flaps (FFCF). We developed a monitoring algorithm for flap perfusion, which was evaluated in 15 patients. For 14 patients, ischemia of the FFCF in the forearm and successful reperfusion of the implanted FFCF was quantified based on the local signal. One FFCF showed no perfusion after reperfusion and devitalized in the course. Intraoperative monitoring of perfusion with rPPG provides objective and reproducible results. Therefore, rPPG is a promising technology for standard flap perfusion monitoring on low costs without the need for additional monitoring devices.

Indexed as

Free Tissue FlapsPhotoplethysmographyHumansMonitoring, IntraoperativeMonitoring, PhysiologicPerfusion

Identifiers

PMID36707664
PMCPMC9883527
OpenAlexW4318315141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.