Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36707640›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Inferring genetic structure when there is little: population genetics versus genomics of the threatened bat Miniopterus schreibersii across Europe.

Christophe Dufresnes, Ludovic Dutoit, Alan Brelsford, Fardo Goldstein-Witsenburg, Laura Clément, Adria López-Baucells, Jorge Palmeirim, Igor Pavlinić, Dino Scaravelli, Martin Ševčík and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The genome sequence of the Lesser noctule,Wellcome open research · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Acknowledging more biodiversity without more species.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Christophe Dufresnes *Laboratory for Amphibian Systematic and Evolutionary Research, College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China. christophe.dufresnes@hotmail.fr.
Ludovic Dutoit *Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Alan BrelsfordDepartment of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA.
Fardo Goldstein-WitsenburgDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Laura ClémentDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Adria López-BaucellsBat Research Area, Granollers Museum of Natural Sciences, Carrer Palaudaries 102, 08402, Granollers, Spain.
Jorge PalmeirimDepartment of Animal Biology, Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Change - cE3c, University of Lisbon, 1749-016, Lisbon, Portugal.
Igor PavlinićDepartment of Zoology, Croatian Natural History Museum, Demetrova 1, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.
Dino ScaravelliDepartment of Biological, Geological, and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, Via Selmi 3, 40126, Bologna, Italy.
Martin ŠevčíkDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Viničná 7, 128 44, Prague 2, Czech Republic.
Philippe ChristeDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland. philippe.christe@unil.ch.
Jérôme GoudetDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland. jerome.goudet@unil.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite their paramount importance in molecular ecology and conservation, genetic diversity and structure remain challenging to quantify with traditional genotyping methods. Next-generation sequencing holds great promises, but this has not been properly tested in highly mobile species. In this article, we compared microsatellite and RAD-sequencing (RAD-seq) analyses to investigate population structure in the declining bent-winged bat (Miniopterus schreibersii) across Europe. Both markers retrieved general patterns of weak range-wide differentiation, little sex-biased dispersal, and strong isolation by distance that associated with significant genetic structure between the three Mediterranean Peninsulas, which could have acted as glacial refugia. Microsatellites proved uninformative in individual-based analyses, but the resolution offered by genomic SNPs illuminated on regional substructures within several countries, with colonies sharing migrators of distinct ancestry without admixture. This finding is consistent with a marked philopatry and spatial partitioning between mating and rearing grounds in the species, which was suspected from marked-recaptured data. Our study advocates that genomic data are necessary to properly unveil the genetic footprints left by biogeographic processes and social organization in long-distant flyers, which are otherwise rapidly blurred by their high levels of gene flow.

Indexed as

ChiropteraAnimalsEuropeGenetics, PopulationGenetic StructuresGenetic VariationGenomicsMicrosatellite Repeats

Identifiers

PMID36707640
PMCPMC9883447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.