Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36707544›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2023

Neurophysiological mechanisms of error monitoring in human and non-human primates.

Zhongzheng Fu, Amirsaman Sajad, Steven P Errington, Jeffrey D Schall, Ueli Rutishauser

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Towards an integrative neuroscience of metacognition.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Variable Presence of an Evolutionarily New Brain Structure Is Related to Trait Impulsivity.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Computational and Neuronal Basis of Visual Confidence.Annual review of vision science · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhongzheng FuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. zzbrooksfu@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2572-6284
Amirsaman SajadCenter for Integrative & Cognitive Neuroscience, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9185-5041
Steven P ErringtonCenter for Integrative & Cognitive Neuroscience, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0948-6559
Jeffrey D SchallCenter for Integrative & Cognitive Neuroscience, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. schalljd@yorku.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5248-943X
Ueli RutishauserDepartment of Neurosurgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. rutishauseru@csmc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9207-7069

Funding

Neuronal mechanisms of human episodic memoryU01NS117839 · NINDS · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI MAMELAK, ADAM NATHANIEL, RUTISHAUSER, UELI · 2020 to 2024
$7.8M
Single-neuron mechanisms of executive control of long-term memory processes in humansR01MH110831 · NIMH · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI RUTISHAUSER, UELI · 2016 to 2020
$2.2M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH110831NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS117839
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Performance monitoring is an important executive function that allows us to gain insight into our own behaviour. This remarkable ability relies on the frontal cortex, and its impairment is an aspect of many psychiatric diseases. In recent years, recordings from the macaque and human medial frontal cortex have offered a detailed understanding of the neurophysiological substrate that underlies performance monitoring. Here we review the discovery of single-neuron correlates of error monitoring, a key aspect of performance monitoring, in both species. These neurons are the generators of the error-related negativity, which is a non-invasive biomarker that indexes error detection. We evaluate a set of tasks that allows the synergistic elucidation of the mechanisms of cognitive control across the two species, consider differences in brain anatomy and testing conditions across species, and describe the clinical relevance of these findings for understanding psychopathology. Last, we integrate the body of experimental facts into a theoretical framework that offers a new perspective on how error signals are computed in both species and makes novel, testable predictions.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersPrimatesAnimalsBrainElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsExecutive FunctionHumans

Identifiers

PMID36707544
PMCPMC10231843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.