ArticleScientific reports2023
Raman spectroscopy and convolutional neural networks for monitoring biochemical radiation response in breast tumour xenografts.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Training and validation of a 1D CNN model for accurate three-class classification of oral cancer using serum Raman spectroscopy.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Raman Spectroscopic Signatures of Hepatic Carcinoma: Progress and Future Prospect.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- High reliability Ag/Ni/NiO nanowire-based SERS for cancer detection: a study on breast cancer.Nanoscale advances · 2026Article
- From Innovation to Application: Can Emerging Imaging Techniques Transform Breast Cancer Diagnosis?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The role of spectral characteristics of urine in bladder cancer diagnostics.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Classification of disease subtypes in medical spectroscopy for multi-category sample imbalances based on grouping and hierarchical learning.Lasers in medical science · 2025Article
- Detection of radiosensitive subpopulationsFrontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Unveiling the Molecular Secrets: A Comprehensive Review of Raman Spectroscopy in Biological Research.ACS omega · 2024Review
- Investigating In Vivo Tumor Biomolecular Changes Following Radiation Therapy Using Raman Spectroscopy.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Employing Raman Spectroscopy and Machine Learning for the Identification of Breast Cancer.Biological procedures online · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tumour cells exhibit altered metabolic pathways that lead to radiation resistance and disease progression. Raman spectroscopy (RS) is a label-free optical modality that can monitor post-irradiation biomolecular signatures in tumour cells and tissues. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) perform automated feature extraction directly from data, with classification accuracy exceeding that of traditional machine learning, in cases where data is abundant and feature extraction is challenging. We are interested in developing a CNN-based predictive model to characterize clinical tumour response to radiation therapy based on their degree of radiosensitivity or radioresistance. In this work, a CNN architecture is built for identifying post-irradiation spectral changes in Raman spectra of tumour tissue. The model was trained to classify irradiated versus non-irradiated tissue using Raman spectra of breast tumour xenografts. The CNN effectively classified the tissue spectra, with accuracies exceeding 92.1% for data collected 3 days post-irradiation, and 85.0% at day 1 post-irradiation. Furthermore, the CNN was evaluated using a leave-one-out- (mouse, section or Raman map) validation approach to investigate its generalization to new test subjects. The CNN retained good predictive accuracy (average accuracies 83.7%, 91.4%, and 92.7%, respectively) when little to no information for a specific subject was given during training. Finally, the classification performance of the CNN was compared to that of a previously developed model based on group and basis restricted non-negative matrix factorization and random forest (GBR-NMF-RF) classification. We found that CNN yielded higher classification accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in mice assessed 3 days post-irradiation, as compared with the GBR-NMF-RF approach. Overall, the CNN can detect biochemical spectral changes in tumour tissue at an early time point following irradiation, without the need for previous manual feature extraction. This study lays the foundation for developing a predictive framework for patient radiation response monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.