ArticleScientific reports2023
Automated monitoring of honey bees with barcodes and artificial intelligence reveals two distinct social networks from a single affiliative behavior.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- An open-source high-precision hive for long-term honeybee observation and research.Biology open · 2026Article
- Digital Monitoring and Modeling of Honey Bee Foraging on Clover Flowers Under Heat Stress.microPublication biology · 2026Article
- Genetic variation influences food-sharing sociability in honey bees.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Integrating computer vision and molecular neurobiology to bridge the gap between behavior and the brain.Current opinion in insect science · 2024Review
- Ant social network structure is highly conserved across species.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Integrating real-time data analysis into automatic tracking of social insects.Royal Society open science · 2021Article
- Individual differences in honey bee behavior enabled by plasticity in brain gene regulatory networks.eLife · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Barcode-based tracking of individuals is revolutionizing animal behavior studies, but further progress hinges on whether in addition to determining an individual's location, specific behaviors can be identified and monitored. We achieve this goal using information from the barcodes to identify tightly bounded image regions that potentially show the behavior of interest. These image regions are then analyzed with convolutional neural networks to verify that the behavior occurred. When applied to a challenging test case, detecting social liquid transfer (trophallaxis) in the honey bee hive, this approach yielded a 67% higher sensitivity and an 11% lower error rate than the best detector for honey bee trophallaxis so far. We were furthermore able to automatically detect whether a bee donates or receives liquid, which previously required manual observations. By applying our trophallaxis detector to recordings from three honey bee colonies and performing simulations, we discovered that liquid exchanges among bees generate two distinct social networks with different transmission capabilities. Finally, we demonstrate that our approach generalizes to detecting other specific behaviors. We envision that its broad application will enable automatic, high-resolution behavioral studies that address a broad range of previously intractable questions in evolutionary biology, ethology, neuroscience, and molecular biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.