ArticleScientific reports2023
Multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment training simulation by paired teachers using case-based teaching of oral histopathology that promotes clinical thinking.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of an MDT-CDIO integrated teaching model in orthopedic clinical education: a controlled study.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Assessment of the real MDT teaching model in medical imaging internship: an educational-oriented study.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Enhancing clinical reasoning skills through tailored CPC in pathology laboratory instruction.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment (MDT) model has significant advantages in the diagnosing and treatment of intricate cases. In addition, it can eliminate subspecialty barriers and provide a more accurate and individualized diagnosis and treatment plan. It has been assumed that the future development of diagnosis and treatment will retain this course, and the MDT is an essential type of clinical thinking, especially for medical students. This study attempted to guide stomatology undergraduates' thinking via an MDT simulation in oral histopathology practicums through typical case-based education and paired-teachers' explanations. The aim was to cultivate clinical thinking among students based on individual cases and to improve class participation and students' clinical thinking ability. Forty-six undergraduates in a 5-year stomatology program who enrolled in 2018 participated in a simulation MDT model. Ten typical clinical cases were selected, and they were previously collected and analyzed by clinicians in accordance with the simulation MDT model and handed out to teachers and students before the class. Two to three cases were interpreted by teacher pairs that included a pathologist (oral pathology teacher) and a radiologist (oral imaging teacher). The rest of the cases were used for simulation MDT student groups in class. The oral pathology teacher and oral imaging teacher illustrated the corresponding data from typical cases in advance. The simulation MDT group members acting as a surgeon, pathologist, or radiologist demonstrated their own cases assigned randomly before the class. A curriculum satisfaction survey illustrated that the simulation MDT group agreed that simulation MDT was novel for them, and they had a strong sense of participation. The mimic MDT training with typical cases guided by paired teachers was useful for establishing student clinical thinking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.