Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36707509›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Cellular senescence in malignant cells promotes tumor progression in mouse and patient Glioblastoma.

Rana Salam, Alexa Saliou, Franck Bielle, Mathilde Bertrand, Christophe Antoniewski, Catherine Carpentier, Agusti Alentorn, Laurent Capelle, Marc Sanson, Emmanuelle Huillard and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed
19.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mechanisms, Microenvironments, and Models: Understanding Therapeutic Resistance in Glioblastoma.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Engineered bacteria reprogram tumor microenvironmentActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rana Salam *Paris Brain Institute (ICM), Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, Genetics and Development of Brain Tumors Team, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0155-6081
Alexa Saliou *Paris Brain Institute (ICM), Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, Genetics and Development of Brain Tumors Team, Paris, France.
Franck BielleParis Brain Institute (ICM), Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, Genetics and Development of Brain Tumors Team, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6564-6388
Mathilde BertrandParis Brain Institute (ICM), Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, Data Analysis Core Platform, Paris, France.
Christophe AntoniewskiSorbonne Université, CNRS FR3631, Inserm US037, Institut de Biologie Paris Seine (IBPS), ARTbio Bioinformatics Analysis Facility, Paris, Institut Français de Bioinformatique (IFB), Paris, France.
Catherine CarpentierParis Brain Institute (ICM), Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, Genetics and Development of Brain Tumors Team, Paris, France.
Agusti AlentornParis Brain Institute (ICM), Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, Genetics and Development of Brain Tumors Team, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7220-2686
Laurent CapelleAP-HP, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Service de Neurochirurgie, Paris, France.
Marc SansonParis Brain Institute (ICM), Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, Genetics and Development of Brain Tumors Team, Paris, France.
Emmanuelle HuillardParis Brain Institute (ICM), Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, Genetics and Development of Brain Tumors Team, Paris, France.
Léa BellengerSorbonne Université, CNRS FR3631, Inserm US037, Institut de Biologie Paris Seine (IBPS), ARTbio Bioinformatics Analysis Facility, Paris, Institut Français de Bioinformatique (IFB), Paris, France.
Justine GuéganParis Brain Institute (ICM), Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, Data Analysis Core Platform, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1315-6042
Isabelle Le RouxParis Brain Institute (ICM), Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, Genetics and Development of Brain Tumors Team, Paris, France. isabelle.leroux@icm-institute.org.ORCID 0000-0003-2240-1641
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults, yet it remains refractory to systemic therapy. Elimination of senescent cells has emerged as a promising new treatment approach against cancer. Here, we investigated the contribution of senescent cells to GBM progression. Senescent cells are identified in patient and mouse GBMs. Partial removal of p16

Indexed as

GlioblastomaAnimalsCellular SenescenceCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16EcosystemFemaleGene Expression RegulationMicePhenotypeCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16

Identifiers

PMID36707509
PMCPMC9883514
OpenAlexW4318219023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.