Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36707485›Full record

ArticleHealth care management science2023

Predicting no-show appointments in a pediatric hospital in Chile using machine learning.

J Dunstan, F Villena, J P Hoyos, V Riquelme, M Royer, H Ramírez, J Peypouquet

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health care management science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

J DunstanCenter for Mathematical Modeling (CNRS IRL2807), University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6726-7242
F VillenaCenter for Mathematical Modeling (CNRS IRL2807), University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8759-466X
J P HoyosEscuela de pregrados-Dirección Académica - Vicerrectoría, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede De La Paz, La Paz, Colombia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1844-9127
V RiquelmeCenter for Mathematical Modeling (CNRS IRL2807), University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9941-7831
M RoyerDr. Luis Calvo Mackenna Hospital, Santiago, Chile.
H RamírezCenter for Mathematical Modeling (CNRS IRL2807), University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6239-1890
J PeypouquetBernoulli Institute for Mathematics, Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Science and EngineeringUniversity of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. j.g.peypouquet@rug.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8551-0522
University of Chile · CLHospital Luis Calvo Mackenna · CLPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CLUniversidad Nacional de Colombia · COUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Chilean public health system serves 74% of the country's population, and 19% of medical appointments are missed on average because of no-shows. The national goal is 15%, which coincides with the average no-show rate reported in the private healthcare system. Our case study, Doctor Luis Calvo Mackenna Hospital, is a public high-complexity pediatric hospital and teaching center in Santiago, Chile. Historically, it has had high no-show rates, up to 29% in certain medical specialties. Using machine learning algorithms to predict no-shows of pediatric patients in terms of demographic, social, and historical variables. To propose and evaluate metrics to assess these models, accounting for the cost-effective impact of possible intervention strategies to reduce no-shows. We analyze the relationship between a no-show and demographic, social, and historical variables, between 2015 and 2018, through the following traditional machine learning algorithms: Random Forest, Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machines, AdaBoost and algorithms to alleviate the problem of class imbalance, such as RUS Boost, Balanced Random Forest, Balanced Bagging and Easy Ensemble. These class imbalances arise from the relatively low number of no-shows to the total number of appointments. Instead of the default thresholds used by each method, we computed alternative ones via the minimization of a weighted average of type I and II errors based on cost-effectiveness criteria. 20.4% of the 395,963 appointments considered presented no-shows, with ophthalmology showing the highest rate among specialties at 29.1%. Patients in the most deprived socioeconomic group according to their insurance type and commune of residence and those in their second infancy had the highest no-show rate. The history of non-attendance is strongly related to future no-shows. An 8-week experimental design measured a decrease in no-shows of 10.3 percentage points when using our reminder strategy compared to a control group. Among the variables analyzed, those related to patients' historical behavior, the reservation delay from the creation of the appointment, and variables that can be associated with the most disadvantaged socioeconomic group, are the most relevant to predict a no-show. Moreover, the introduction of new cost-effective metrics significantly impacts the validity of our prediction models. Using a prototype to call patients with the highest risk of no-shows resulted in a noticeable decrease in the overall no-show rate.

Indexed as

Hospitals, PediatricPatient Acceptance of Health CareAlgorithmsAppointments and SchedulesChildChileDelivery of Health CareHumansAppointments and schedulesMachine learningMedical informaticsNo-show patientsPublic health

Identifiers

PMID36707485
PMCPMC10257628
OpenAlexW4318275401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.