Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36707247›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2023

Discontinuation of government subsidized HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in Australia: a whole-of-population analysis of dispensing records.

Nicholas Andrew Medland, Doug Fraser, Benjamin R Bavinton, Fengyi Jin, Andrew E Grulich, Heath Paynter, Rebecca Guy, Hamish McManus

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholas Andrew MedlandKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Doug FraserKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Benjamin R BavintonKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Fengyi JinKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Andrew E GrulichKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Heath PaynterAustralian Federation of AIDS Organisations, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Rebecca GuyKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Hamish McManusKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
UNSW Sydney · AUAustralian Federation of Graduate Women New South Wales · AUMonash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been government subsidized in Australia since April 2018 and while uptake is high among men who have sex with men, rates of discontinuation are also high. The aims of this study were to examine the impact of discontinuation on overall PrEP usage, the proportion of PrEP users who discontinue and the predictors of discontinuation.

methodsWe used linked de-identified dispensing records of all government subsidized PrEP in Australia between April 2018 and September 2021: a whole-of-population data set. Defining discontinuation as 180 days or more without PrEP after the final dispensed supply, we calculated the number of people who discontinued at each 6-month interval during the study period, the proportion who had discontinued 2 years after the first supply and, using Cox regression, predictors of discontinuation.

resultsOf 49,164 people dispensed PrEP (98.5% male, median age 34 years), 40.3% (19,815) had discontinued by September 2021. Within 2 years of their first supply, 11,150 (37.7%) of 29,549 PrEP users had discontinued, including 10.0% after a single dispensed supply. Large variations were observed, particularly according to prescriber characteristics: discontinuation was higher among people prescribed PrEP by low caseload (≤10 patients) prescribers (61.2%) than by high caseload (>100 patients) prescribers (31.1%, p<0.001), and by prescribers practising in areas with low estimated prevalence (<1.0%) of gay men (64.1%) than high (>5%) prevalence (36.7%, p<0.001). Women and younger people were more likely to discontinue, while patients receiving a higher level of government subsidy were less likely. The independent predictors of discontinuation with the greatest effect size were female sex (adjusted hazards ratio [aHR] 2.99, p<0.001), low estimated gay prevalence of prescriber location (aHR 1.98, p<0.001) and low prescriber PrEP caseload (aHR 1.79, p<0.001).

conclusionsThere are high rates of PrEP discontinuation in Australia and some populations are at increased risk of discontinuation. Strategies are needed to support persistence on PrEP and the re-starting of PrEP during periods of risk.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisSexual and Gender MinoritiesAdultAustraliaFemaleHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleAnti-HIV AgentsdiscontinuationdispensingHIVpre-exposure prophylaxispreventionretention

Identifiers

PMID36707247
PMCPMC9883116
OpenAlexW4318391865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.