Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36707237›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice2024

Implementing an innovative, patient-centered approach to day case arthroplasty: improving patient outcomes through remote preoperative pharmacist consultations.

Kieran Fitzpatrick, Keith Addie, Martin Shaw, Roger Higginson, Lindsay Hudman, Jasmine Samuel, Ruth Forrest, Pamela MacTavish

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effect of pharmacist care on clinical outcomes and therapy optimization in perioperative settings: A systematic review.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kieran FitzpatrickPharmacy Department, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK kieran.fitzpatrick@ggc.scot.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9570-0576
Keith AddiePharmacy Department, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Martin ShawNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
Roger HigginsonGlasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Lindsay HudmanGlasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Jasmine SamuelGlasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Ruth ForrestIntensive Care Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Pamela MacTavishIntensive Care Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Glasgow Royal Infirmary · GBQueen Elizabeth University Hospital · GBNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveElective surgery suffered significant loss of capacity during the COVID-19 pandemic. To address this, hip and knee arthroplasties are being conducted as day case procedures. Pre-admission pharmacist consultations were introduced (the intervention) for these patients. This consultation aimed to address perioperative medicines issues, promote patient empowerment, improve prescribing quality and contribute to reduction in length of stay (LoS).

methodsAll patients listed for a total/unicompartmental knee replacement (TKR/UKR) or total hip replacement (THR) at an ambulatory care hospital were identified by a pharmacist prescriber 1-2 weeks before the operation. Pharmacist consultations were conducted remotely with discharge prescriptions written electronically and dispensed before admission. Prescribing data were collected for both pre-intervention (n=80) and post-intervention (n=129) groups along with all interventions undertaken during consultations. Staff opinion was sought via online questionnaire and patient opinion was gathered via post-discharge telephone calls.

resultsA total of 115 interventions took place during 129 patient consultations and >75% of interventions were of a significance expected to improve patient care. Prescribing standards were improved in the intervention group compared with patients whose arthroplasty was before the introduction of this service. The pharmacy service would have produced a different prescription in 38.8% of the pre-intervention group. Staff and patient feedback was extremely positive and all patients with previous surgical experience in the health board reported an improved experience. There was a statistically significant reduction in post-discharge healthcare encounters (such as general practitioner (GP) visits) in the intervention group.

conclusionThis novel remote preoperative pharmacist consultation improved prescribing standards, enhanced the patient's surgical experience and reduced the burden on post-discharge healthcare systems.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeCOVID-19Patient-Centered CarePharmacistsPreoperative CareAgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPharmacy Service, HospitalReferral and ConsultationAnticoagulantsEDUCATION, PHARMACYPAIN MANAGEMENTPHARMACY SERVICE, HOSPITALSURGERY

Identifiers

PMID36707237
PMCPMC11265558
OpenAlexW4318250405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.