Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36707153›Full record

ReviewProgress in molecular biology and translational science2023

Opioid signaling and design of analgesics.

Barnali Paul, Sashrik Sribhashyam, Susruta Majumdar

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Progress in molecular biology and translational science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Total synthesis and biological activity of "carbamorphine": O-to-CHProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Barnali PaulCenter for Clinical Pharmacology, University of Health Sciences & Pharmacy at St Louis and Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, United States.
Sashrik SribhashyamCenter for Clinical Pharmacology, University of Health Sciences & Pharmacy at St Louis and Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, United States.
Susruta MajumdarCenter for Clinical Pharmacology, University of Health Sciences & Pharmacy at St Louis and Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, United States. Electronic address: susrutam@email.wustl.edu.
University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Chemistry and Biology of Mitragynine AlkaloidsR01DA046487 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI MAJUMDAR, SUSRUTA, SAMES, DALIBOR · 2018 to 2022
$3.0M
Pharmacological Probes based on mitragynine pseudoindoxylR33DA045884 · NIDA · ST. LOUIS COLLEGE OF PHARMACY · PI MAJUMDAR, SUSRUTA, SAMES, DALIBOR · 2020 to 2021
$792k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA046487NIDA NIH HHS R33 DA045884
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical treatment of acute to severe pain relies on the use of opioids. While their potency is significant, there are considerable side effects that can negatively affect patients. Their rise in usage has correlated with the current opioid epidemic in the United States, which has led to more than 70,000 deaths per year (Volkow and Blanco, 2021). Opioid-related drug development aims to make target compounds that show strong potency but with diminished side effects. Research into pharmaceuticals that could act as potential alternatives to current pains medications has relied on mechanistic insights of opioid receptors, a class of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), and biased agonism, a common phenomenon among pharmaceutical compounds where downstream effects can be altered at the same receptor via different agonists. Opioids function typically by binding to an active site on the extracellular portion of opioid receptors. Once activated, the opioid receptor initiates a G-protein signaling pathway and/or the β-arrestin2 pathway. The proposed concept for the development of safe analgesics around mu and kappa opioid receptor subtypes has focused on not recruiting β-arrestin2 (biased agonism) and/or having low efficacy at the receptor (partial agonism). By altering chemical motifs on a common scaffold, chemists can take advantage of biased agonism as well as create compounds with low intrinsic efficacy for the desired treatments. This review will focus on ligands with bias profile, signaling aspects of the receptor and probe into the structural basis of receptor that leads to bias and/or partial agonism.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidReceptors, Opioid, muAnalgesicsHumansReceptors, OpioidSignal TransductionAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidReceptors, OpioidReceptors, Opioid, muAnalgesiaG-protein biasOpioid partial agonistsPZM21TM5 ECL2β-Arrestin

Identifiers

PMID36707153
PMCPMC10325139
OpenAlexW4289924152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.