Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36706646›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology2023

Role of adjuvant therapy in intermediate-risk cervical cancer patients - Subanalyses of the SCCAN study.

David Cibula, Huseyin Akilli, Jiri Jarkovsky, Luc van Lonkhuijzen, Giovanni Scambia, Mehmet Mutlu Meydanli, David Isla Ortiz, Henrik Falconer, Nadeem R Abu-Rustum, Diego Odetto and 20 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 19 institutions in 14 countries.

David CibulaGynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital (Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group, CEEGOG), Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: dc@davidcibula.cz.
Huseyin AkilliBaskent University School of Medicine Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara, Turkey.
Jiri JarkovskyInstitute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Luc van LonkhuijzenAmsterdam University Medical Centers, Center for Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Giovanni ScambiaFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Rome, Italy.
Mehmet Mutlu MeydanliDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.
David Isla OrtizGynecology Oncology Center, National Institute of Cancerology Mexico, Mexico.
Henrik FalconerDepartment of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Nadeem R Abu-RustumMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, USA.
Diego OdettoDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Jaroslav KlátDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital and University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Ricardo Dos ReisDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ignacio ZapardielGynecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital - IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.
Giampaolo Di MartinoGynaecologic Surgical Unit, ASST-Monza, San Gerardo Hospital,University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Jiri PreslDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Rene LakyGynecology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Aldo LópezDepartment of Gynecological Surgery, National Institute of Neoplastic Diseases, Lima, Peru.
Vit WeinbergerUniversity Hospital Brno, Medical Faculty of Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Andreas ObermairQueensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer; The University of Queensland, Australia.
Rene ParejaDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, Colombia.
Renata PoncováGynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital (Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group, CEEGOG), Prague, Czech Republic.
Constantijne MomAmsterdam University Medical Centers, Center for Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Nicolò BizzarriFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Rome, Italy.
Martina BorčinováGynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital (Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group, CEEGOG), Prague, Czech Republic.
Koray AslanDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.
Rosa Angélica Salcedo HernandezGynecology Oncology Center, National Institute of Cancerology Mexico, Mexico.
Guus FonsAmsterdam University Medical Centers, Center for Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Klára BenešováInstitute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Lukáš DostálekGynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital (Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group, CEEGOG), Prague, Czech Republic.
Ali AyhanBaskent University School of Medicine Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Ankara, Turkey.
Charles University · CZAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITBaşkent University · TRInstituto Nacional de Cancerología · MXMasaryk University · CZSağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TRAzienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo · ITCentre for Cancer Biology · AUHospital de Câncer de Barretos · BRHospital Italiano de Buenos Aires · ARHospital Universitario La Paz · ESInstituto Nacional de Cancerología · COInstituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas · PEKarolinska University Hospital · SEMedical University of Graz · ATMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversity Hospital Brno · CZUniversity of Ostrava · CZ

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe "intermediate-risk" (IR) group of early-stage cervical cancer patients is characterized by negative pelvic lymph nodes and a combination of tumor-related prognostic risk factors such as tumor size ≥2 cm, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), and deep stromal invasion. However, the role of adjuvant treatment in these patients remains controversial. We investigated whether adjuvant (chemo)radiation is associated with a survival benefit after radical surgery in patients with IR cervical cancer.

methodsWe analyzed data from patients with IR cervical cancer (tumor size 2-4 cm plus LVSI OR tumor size >4 cm; N0; no parametrial invasion; clear surgical margins) who underwent primary curative-intent surgery between 2007 and 2016 and were retrospectively registered in the international multicenter Surveillance in Cervical CANcer (SCCAN) study.

resultsOf 692 analyzed patients, 274 (39.6%) received no adjuvant treatment (AT-) and 418 (60.4%) received radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (AT+). The 5-year disease-free survival (83.2% and 80.3%; P

conclusionAmong patients with IR early-stage cervical cancer, radical surgery alone achieved equal disease-free and overall survival rates to those achieved by combining radical surgery with adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansHysterectomyNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRetrospective StudiesAdjuvant treatmentCervical cancerGOG criteriaIntermediate riskRadial surgeryRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID36706646
PMCPMC10281542
OpenAlexW4318022854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.