Trial reportClinical imaging2023
Radiologic and histopathologic features of hydrogel sealant after lung resection in participants of a prospective randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Clinical imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incidence and features of pulmonary track nodules after CT-guided lung biopsy with track sealing using gelatin sponge slurry.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo summarize imaging and histopathologic characteristics of hydrogel sealant (plug) in lung parenchyma and assess their correlation with time since deployment of sealant. MATERIALS AND
methodsAmong a total of 208 participants randomized to the hydrogel sealant arm of a lung biopsy prospective randomized clinical trial, 51 underwent resection of the biopsied lesion. In 34 participants sealant material was present on histopathologic sections (n = 22), or they had cross-sectional imaging of chest between biopsy and resection (n = 23) or they had both imaging and histopathology (n = 11). Histopathologic and imaging findings were described. The association of these findings with time since sealant deployment was evaluated using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.
resultsThe mean time since sealant deployment for histopathology was 45.7 days (median 36, range 14-181) and for imaging studies was 99 days (median 32, range 4-527). The sealant was infiltrated by inflammatory cells in 20 (91%) participants. The main general histopathologic pattern of sealant was foamy in 12 (57%) and mesh in 8 (38%) participants. Imaging appearance of sealant was serpiginous in 18 (60%), linear in 10 (33%) or lobulated in 2 (6.7%) participants. In 2 participants the sealant was hypermetabolic with no histopathologic evidence of tumor. No correlation was found between time since sealant deployment and imaging or histopathologic appearances.
conclusionHydrogel sealant appears as a serpiginous, linear, or lobulated opacity on cross-sectional imaging which can be metabolically active. It is associated with an inflammatory reaction with a foamy or mesh general pattern on histopathological assessment. No correlation was found between time since sealant deployment and imaging or histopathologic appearances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.