Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36706349›Full record

ArticleJCO global oncology2023

National Cancer Grid Virtual Tumor Boards of Head and Neck Cancers: An Innovative Approach to Multidisciplinary Care.

Shivakumar Thiagarajan, Vinisha Poojari, Vidisha Tuljapurkar, Sarbani Ghosh-Laskar, Khuzema Fatehi, Sajith Babu, Prashant Penumadu, Asawari Patil, Amit Joshi, Suman Kumar and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO global oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Shivakumar ThiagarajanDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1957-3338
Vinisha PoojariAccess Health International, Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5770-9040
Vidisha TuljapurkarDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Sarbani Ghosh-LaskarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0744-4838
Khuzema FatehiBombay Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Sajith BabuMIMS, Calicut, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4866-0473
Prashant PenumaduDepartment of Surgical Oncology, JIPMER, Pondicherry, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2189-5056
Asawari PatilDepartment of Pathology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8203-986X
Amit JoshiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Suman KumarDepartment of Radiology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Devendra ChaukarDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6309-9536
Ravi KannanCachar Cancer Centre, Silchar, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5888-5225
C S PrameshTata Memorial Hospital, Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3635-0083
Homi Bhabha National Institute · INBombay Hospital · INInternational Institute for Population Sciences · INSilchar Medical College and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeVirtual tumor board (VTB) via videoconference facility involving multiple specialists in the decision making for various tumors is well accepted, especially in high-income countries. Information on virtual tumor boards for head and neck cancers especially from low- and middle-income countries is sparse. In this study, we have audited the findings of the National Cancer Grid VTBs performed for head and neck cancers.

methodsAll patients discussed in the head and neck VTBs at our center between December 2016 and February 2022 were included in the study. Details such as the type of institute sending patients for discussion, its location, subsites within the head and neck region, histopathology, treatment setting or question for the VTB, and availability of guidelines for such patient scenarios were assessed. Also, a survey was sent to assess the usefulness of the VTBs.

resultsA total of 208 patients were discussed in 54 VTB sessions. The most common head and neck sites discussed in the VTBs were the oral cavity (n = 64, 30.7%) followed by skull base/nose and paranasal sinuses/eyelid-orbit tumors (n = 49, 23.5%). Nonsquamous cell carcinoma was the most common histopathology discussed; recurrent cancers/residual diseases were the most common treatment settings (n = 134, 64.4%) for which there were no existing guidelines. Survey results showed that most VTB decisions were implementable, and respondents felt that VTBs were a useful educational tool as well.

conclusionOur study affirms the feasibility of VTBs in low- and middle-income countries' health care systems for managing uncommon malignancies and clinical situations, which act as an important educational platform.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalHumans

Identifiers

PMID36706349
PMCPMC10166436
OpenAlexW4318391185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.