ArticlePloS one2023
One single drug-coated balloon for all shapes/diameters? Neointimal proliferation inhibition in porcine peripheral arteries.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Towards the Integration of an Anti-Contractile Compound Within Drug-Coated Balloon Therapy.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2025Article
- Hydrophilic Coating Microstructure Mediates Acute Drug Transfer in Drug-Coated Balloon Therapy.ACS applied bio materials · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLong diseased vessel segments of peripheral arteries may display irregular shapes with different diameters. The aim of this study was to investigate inhibition of neointimal proliferation in porcine peripheral vessels with different diameters covered by one single hyper-compliant drug-coated balloon (HCDCB), compared to conventional drug-coated balloons (DCB), each selected according to the respective vessel diameter. METHODS AND
resultsNeointimal proliferation was stimulated in proximal and distal segments of the peripheral arteries by balloon overstretch and stent implantation. Inhibition of neointimal proliferation by one single HCDCB was compared to two vessel diameter-adjusted DCB per artery and to one single uncoated hyper-compliant balloon (HCB). Sixteen HCB, 16 HCDCB, and 32 DCB were used in 16 arteries each. Quantitative angiography (QA), optical coherence tomography (OCT) and histology showed a similar anti-restenotic effect for one HCDCB compared to two vessel diameter-adjusted DCB in narrow distal and wider proximal segments (QA diameter stenosis: 18.7±12.3% vs. 22.8±15.5%, p = 0.535; OCT area stenosis: 21.4±11.6% vs. 23.6±12.3%, p = 0.850; histomorphometry diameter stenosis: 27.5±7.1% vs. 26.9±8.0%, p = 0.952) and indicated significant inhibition of neointimal proliferation by HCDCB vs. uncoated HCB (QA diameter stenosis: 18.7±12.3% vs. 30.3±16.7%, p = 0.008; OCT area stenosis: 21.4±11.6% vs. 34.7±16.0%, p = 0.004; histomorphometry diameter stenosis: 27.5±7.1% vs. 32.5±8.5%, p = 0.038).
conclusionsHCDCB were found to be similar effective as DCB in inhibiting neointimal proliferation in vessel segments with different diameters. One single long HCDCB may allow for treatment of segments with variable diameters, and thus, replace the use of several vessel diameter-adjusted DCB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.