ArticlePloS one2023
Efficacy and safety of guide extension catheter in balloon pulmonary angioplasty for treatment of complex lesions in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- "Guidezilla" extension catheter combined with balloon technique for treating pulmonary artery stenosis caused by Takayasu arteritis.Journal of interventional medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBalloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) is used for treatment of inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and residual pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) to improve hemodynamics, right ventricular function, and exercise capacity. However, the effectiveness and safety of guide extension catheters for BPA treatment in patients with CTEPH have not been demonstrated.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 91 lesions in 55 sessions of 28 patients with CTEPH who underwent BPA using a guide extension catheter. The purpose (backup, coaxial, and extension), efficacy, and safety of the guide extension catheters were explored. The efficacy of the guide extension catheter was assessed based on the success of the procedures and safety was evaluated based on procedure-related complications.
resultsRegarding the intended use, a guide extension catheter was used to strengthen the backup force of the guiding catheter in 52% of cases, extend the tip of the catheter in 38% of cases, and maintain the coaxiality of the guiding catheter in 10% of cases. Procedural success was achieved in 92.7% of 55 sessions and in 95.6% of 91 lesions. Complex lesions had a lower success rate than simple lesions (p = 0.04). Regarding safety concerns, complications were observed in 5 of 55 sessions (9.1%) and 6 of 91 lesions (6.6%). Only one case of pulmonary artery dissection using a guide extension catheter was reported. Except for this one case, extension catheter-related complications were not observed.
conclusionsA guide extension catheter can be used safely in BPA procedures with anatomically complex pulmonary artery branches and complex lesions by increasing backup support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.