ArticleJAMA network open2023
Association of State Insurance Mandates for Fertility Treatment With Multiple Embryo Transfer After Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy.
Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Multiple gestation is one of the biggest risks after in vitro fertilization (IVF), largely due to multiple embryo transfer (MET). Single embryo transfer (SET) uptake has increased over time and has been attributed to various factors, such as mandated insurance coverage for IVF and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). Objective: To investigate whether mandates for IVF insurance coverage are associated with decreased use of MET after PGT-A. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was conducted using data on embryo transfers reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology between 2014 and 2016. Data were analyzed from January to October 2021. Exposures: State-mandated coverage for fertility treatment and type of cycle transfer performed (PGT-A, untested fresh, and untested frozen). Main Outcomes and Measures: Use of MET compared with SET, live birth, and live birth of multiples. Results: There were 110 843 embryo transfers (mean [SD] patient age, 34.0 [4.5] years; 5520 individuals identified as African American [5.0%], 10 035 as Asian [9.0%], 5425 as Hispanic [4.9%], 45 561 as White [41.1%], and 44 302 as other or unknown race or ethnicity [40.0%]); 17 650 transfers used embryos that underwent PGT-A. Overall, among transferred embryos that had PGT-A, there were 9712 live births (55.0%). The odds of live birth were 70% higher with MET vs SET after frozen embryo transfer with PGT-A (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.61-1.78), but the risk of multiples was 5 times higher (OR, 5.33; 95% CI, 5.22-5.44). The odds of MET in cycles with PGT-A in states with insurance mandates were 24% lower than in states without mandates (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.68-0.85). Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that despite the promise of using SET with PGT-A, MET after PGT-A was not uncommon. This practice was more common in states without insurance mandates and was associated with a high risk of multiples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.