Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36705919›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm to Differentiate Colon Carcinoma From Acute Diverticulitis in Computed Tomography Images.

Sebastian Ziegelmayer, Stefan Reischl, Hannah Havrda, Joshua Gawlitza, Markus Graf, Nicolas Lenhart, Nadja Nehls, Tristan Lemke, Dirk Wilhelm, Fabian Lohöfer and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Utility of Colonoscopy After Acute Colonic Diverticulitis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sebastian ZiegelmayerInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Stefan ReischlInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Hannah HavrdaInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Joshua GawlitzaInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Markus GrafInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Nicolas LenhartInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Nadja NehlsInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Tristan LemkeInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Dirk WilhelmDepartment of Surgery, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Fabian LohöferInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Egon BurianInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Philipp-Alexander NeumannDepartment of Surgery, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Marcus MakowskiInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Rickmer BrarenInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
Technical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Differentiating between malignant and benign etiology in large-bowel wall thickening on computed tomography (CT) images can be a challenging task. Artificial intelligence (AI) support systems can improve the diagnostic accuracy of radiologists, as shown for a variety of imaging tasks. Improvements in diagnostic performance, in particular the reduction of false-negative findings, may be useful in patient care. Objective: To develop and evaluate a deep learning algorithm able to differentiate colon carcinoma (CC) and acute diverticulitis (AD) on CT images and analyze the impact of the AI-support system in a reader study. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this diagnostic study, patients who underwent surgery between July 1, 2005, and October 1, 2020, for CC or AD were included. Three-dimensional (3-D) bounding boxes including the diseased bowel segment and surrounding mesentery were manually delineated and used to develop a 3-D convolutional neural network (CNN). A reader study with 10 observers of different experience levels was conducted. Readers were asked to classify the testing cohort under reading room conditions, first without and then with algorithmic support. Main Outcomes and Measures: To evaluate the diagnostic performance, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for all readers and reader groups with and without AI support. Metrics were compared using the McNemar test and relative and absolute predictive value comparisons. Results: A total of 585 patients (AD: n = 267, CC: n = 318; mean [SD] age, 63.2 [13.4] years; 341 men [58.3%]) were included. The 3-D CNN reached a sensitivity of 83.3% (95% CI, 70.0%-96.6%) and specificity of 86.6% (95% CI, 74.5%-98.8%) for the test set, compared with the mean reader sensitivity of 77.6% (95% CI, 72.9%-82.3%) and specificity of 81.6% (95% CI, 77.2%-86.1%). The combined group of readers improved significantly with AI support from a sensitivity of 77.6% to 85.6% (95% CI, 81.3%-89.3%; P < .001) and a specificity of 81.6% to 91.3% (95% CI, 88.1%-94.5%; P < .001). Artificial intelligence support significantly reduced the number of false-negative and false-positive findings (NPV from 78.5% to 86.4% and PPV from 80.9% to 90.8%; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that a deep learning model able to distinguish CC and AD in CT images as a support system may significantly improve the diagnostic performance of radiologists, which may improve patient care.

Indexed as

CarcinomaDeep LearningDiverticulitisAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceColonHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID36705919
PMCPMC11984516
OpenAlexW4318263403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.