Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36705910›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023

RNA 3D Structure Comparison Using RNA-Puzzles Toolkit.

Marcin Magnus, Zhichao Miao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. ACS chemical biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marcin MagnusReMedy-International Research Agenda Unit, Centre of New Technologies, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Zhichao MiaoEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Hinxton, UK. zmiao@ebi.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational modeling of RNA three-dimensional (3D) structure may help in unrevealing the molecular mechanisms of RNA molecules and in designing molecules with novel functions. An unbiased blind assessment to benchmark the computational modeling is required to understand the achievements and bottlenecks of the prediction, while a standard structure comparison protocol is necessary. RNA-Puzzles is a community-wide effort on the assessment of blind prediction of RNA tertiary structures. And RNA-Puzzles toolkit is a computational resource derived from RNA-Puzzles, which includes (i) decoy sets generated by different RNA 3D structure prediction methods; (ii) 3D structure normalization, analysis, manipulation, and visualization tools; and (iii) 3D structure comparison metric tools. In this chapter, we illustrate a standard RNA 3D structure prediction assessment protocol using the selected tools from RNA-Puzzles toolkit: rna-tools and RNA_assessment.

Indexed as

RNASoftwareComputer SimulationNucleic Acid ConformationRNABase pairRNA 3D structure predictionRNA-PuzzlesStructure comparison

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.