Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36705882›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2023

Patient-Centered Approaches to Cognitive Assessment in Acute TBI.

Leslie W Johnson, Carley Prenshaw, Amber Corbin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leslie W JohnsonDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, North Carolina Central University, 700 Cecil Street, Durham, NC, 27707, USA. ljohn169@nccu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6651-4763
Carley PrenshawDepartment of Rehabilitation Services, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Amber CorbinDepartment of Rehabilitation Services, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
University of North Carolina Hospitals · USNorth Carolina Central University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of the reviewThe purpose of this article is to help clinicians understand how underlying pathophysiologies and medical comorbidities associated with acute traumatic brain injury (TBI) can impact assessment of cognition during the initial stages of recovery. Clinicians can use information from this article to develop assessment plans rooted in patient-centered care. RECENT

findingsThe authors conducted a review of the literature related to the assessment of cognition in acute TBI, focusing on pathophysiology, medical comorbidities, and assessment approaches. Results indicated that TBI pathophysiologies associated with white and gray matter changes make many patients vulnerable to cognitive deficits. Acute comorbidities such as psychological and pain status influence cognitive abilities as well. The current approaches to cognitive assessment can be limited in many ways, though by using the patient's neuropathological profile, noted comorbidities, and other patient specific factors, clinicians can potentially improve the effectiveness of assessment.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesBrain Injuries, TraumaticCognition DisordersCognitive DysfunctionCognitionHumansAssessmentCognitionComorbiditiesPathophysiologyPatient-centered careTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID36705882
OpenAlexW4318219116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.