Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36705846›Full record

ArticleGeroScience2023

Efficient representations of binarized health deficit data: the frailty index and beyond.

Glen Pridham, Kenneth Rockwood, Andrew Rutenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GeroScience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. How human and animal frailty index studies can inform each other: a brief narrative review.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Dynamical Network Stability Analysis of Multiple Biological Ages Provides a Framework for Understanding the Aging Process.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Glen PridhamDepartment of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, B3H 4R2, NS, Canada.
Kenneth RockwoodDivision of Geriatric Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, B3H 2E1, NS, Canada.
Andrew RutenbergDepartment of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, B3H 4R2, NS, Canada. adr@dal.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-4264-6809

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated efficient representations of binarized health deficit data using the 2001-2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). We compared the abilities of features to compress health deficit data and to predict adverse outcomes. We used principal component analysis (PCA) and several other dimensionality reduction techniques, together with several varieties of the frailty index (FI). We observed that the FI approximates the first - primary - component obtained by PCA and other compression techniques. Most adverse outcomes were well predicted using only the FI. While the FI is therefore a useful technique for compressing binary deficits into a single variable, additional dimensions were needed for high-fidelity compression of health deficit data. Moreover, some outcomes - including inflammation and metabolic dysfunction - showed high-dimensional behaviour. We generally found that clinical data were easier to compress than lab data. Our results help to explain the success of the FI as a simple dimensionality reduction technique for binary health data. We demonstrate how PCA extends the FI, providing additional health information, and allows us to explore system dimensionality and complexity. PCA is a promising tool for determining and exploring collective health features from collections of binarized biomarkers.

Indexed as

FrailtyBiomarkersHumansInflammationNutrition SurveysBiomarkersAgingBiological ageDimensionality reductionFrailty indexLogistic principal component analysisPrincipal component analysis

Identifiers

PMID36705846
PMCPMC10400752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.