Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36705772›Full record

SynthesisAIDS and behavior2023

Quantitative Methods Used to Evaluate Impact of Combination HIV Prevention Intervention: A Methodological Systematic Review.

Andrainolo Ravalihasy, Pearl Anne Ante-Testard, Lidia Kardas-Sloma, Yazdan Yazdanpanah, Manuela De Allegri, Valéry Ridde

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in AIDS and behavior, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrainolo RavalihasyCentre Population et Développement (Ceped), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD) et Université Paris Cité, Inserm ERL 1244, 45 Rue Des Saints-Pères, 75006, Paris, France. andrainolo.ravalihasy@ird.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0880-6319
Pearl Anne Ante-TestardMESuRS and Unité PACRI, Institut Pasteur, Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers, Paris, France.
Lidia Kardas-SlomaUMR 1137, Inserm, Université Paris Cité, IAME, Paris, France.
Yazdan YazdanpanahAP-HP, Hôpital Bichat, Service, 75018, Paris, France.
Manuela De AllegriHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Valéry RiddeCentre Population et Développement (Ceped), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD) et Université Paris Cité, Inserm ERL 1244, 45 Rue Des Saints-Pères, 75006, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Combination HIV prevention aims to provide the right mix of biomedical, behavioral and structural interventions, and is considered the best approach to curb the HIV pandemic. The impact evaluation of combined HIV prevention intervention (CHPI) provides critical information for decision making. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to map the designs and methods used in these studies. We searched original articles indexed in Web of Science, Scopus and PubMed. Fifty-eight studies assessing the impact of CHPI on HIV transmission were included. Most of the studies took place in Asia or sub-Saharan Africa and were published from 2000 onward. We identified 36 (62.1%) quasi-experimental studies (posttest, pretest-posttest and nonequivalent group designs) and 22 (37.9%) experimental studies (randomized designs). The findings suggest that diverse methods are already rooted in CHPI impact evaluation practices as recommended but should be better reported. CHPI impact evaluation would benefit from more comprehensive approaches.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsAfrica South of the SaharaAsiaHumansCombination HIV prevention interventionDecision-makingEvidence-basedImpact evaluation

Identifiers

PMID36705772
PMCPMC9881517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.