Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36705770›Full record

ArticleActa parasitologica2023

Sarcocyst Quantification and Viability: Freezing Treatment as an Alternative to Carcass Condemnation.

Bibiana Rodrigues de Freitas, Isac Junior Roman, Bibiana Rossi Reis, Fernando de Souza Rodrigues, Patrícia Braünig, Juliana Felipetto Cargnelutti, Rodrigo Casquero Cunha, Fernanda Silveira Flôres Vogel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Acta parasitologica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bibiana Rodrigues de FreitasDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Pelotas - UFPEL, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Isac Junior RomanLaboratório de Doenças Parasitárias (LADOPAR), Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Av. Roraima, 1000, Prédio 63C, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, 97105-900, Brazil.
Bibiana Rossi ReisLaboratório de Doenças Parasitárias (LADOPAR), Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Av. Roraima, 1000, Prédio 63C, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, 97105-900, Brazil.
Fernando de Souza RodriguesDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Estadual de Londrina - UEL, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
Patrícia BraünigLaboratório de Doenças Parasitárias (LADOPAR), Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Av. Roraima, 1000, Prédio 63C, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, 97105-900, Brazil.
Juliana Felipetto CargneluttiLaboratório de Bacteriologia (LABAC), Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Av. Roraima, 1000, Prédio 63C, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, 97105-900, Brazil.
Rodrigo Casquero CunhaDepartamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Pelotas - UFPEL, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Fernanda Silveira Flôres VogelLaboratório de Doenças Parasitárias (LADOPAR), Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Av. Roraima, 1000, Prédio 63C, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, 97105-900, Brazil. fernanda.vogel@ufsm.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1351-9912
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria · BRUniversidade Federal de Pelotas · BRUniversidade Estadual de Londrina · BR

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Financial Code 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe inspection of animal products is important for controlling parasitic zoonoses. Some processes that guarantee food safety to consumers such as carcass condemnation cause economic losses. This study aimed to detect Sarcocystis cysts in cattle hearts obtained from slaughterhouses and to evaluate sarcocyst viability after freezing treatment.

methodsWhen myocardial tissues were minced and subjected to fresh examination, sarcocysts were observed in all analyzed tissues resulting in 21.73 cysts/g of tissue. Sarcocyst viability was verified after tissue freezing at 35 ± 2 °C and - 20 ± 2 °C for 0-12 h. After freezing, the tissues were minced, and sarcocysts were collected and stained with Tripan Blue. In addition, cysts were mechanically disrupted to check bradyzoite viability.

resultsCysts and bradyzoites were unviable at - 35 °C for ≥ 3 h and - 20 °C for ≥ 8 h.

conclusionThese results suggest freezing treatment as an alternative to condemnation of cattle carcasses contaminated with Sarcocystis spp. Similar studies using freezing treatment with other animals infected by Sarcocystis must be conducted.

Indexed as

SarcocystisSarcocystosisAnimalsCattleFreezingHeartZoonosesCystsFreezingHeartSarcocystis sppSlaughterhouses

Identifiers

PMID36705770
OpenAlexW4318263919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.