Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36705229›Full record

ArticleJNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association2022

Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates among Clinical Samples showing Growth in a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.

Nabina Maharjan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Comparative phenotypic and genotypic analysis of distinctFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Antibiotics Resistance Profile of Clinical Isolates ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Antibiotic susceptibility profile ofIranian journal of microbiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nabina MaharjanDepartment of Microbiology, Lumbini Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Tansen, Palpa, Nepal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Carbapenems resistance due to metallo-beta-lactamase production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a major concern which is increasing globally resulting in limited therapeutic choices. This study aimed to find out the prevalence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates among clinical samples showing growth of a tertiary care centre. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on various clinical samples which showed growth in the Department of Microbiology of a tertiary care centre between 1 September 2020 to 28 February 2021 after receiving ethical approval from the Institutional Review Committee (Reference number: 03-G/020). Convenience sampling was done. All timely received clinical specimens were inoculated and incubated at 37°C for 48 hours and identified by standard microbiological techniques. Point estimate and 95% Confidence Interval were calculated. Results: Among 1049 clinical samples showing growth, 68 (6.48%) (4.99-7.97, 95% Confidence Interval) Pseudomonas aeruginosa were isolated. Among them, 6 (8.82%) were found to be metallo-beta-lactamase positive. Conclusions: The prevalence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was similar to the studies done in similar settings. As metallo-beta-lactamase production was detected among isolated species which can be spread very rapidly and may develop a problematic scenario in treatment procedures, regular surveillance along with judicious use of carbapenems should precede. Keywords: beta-lactamase; multidrug resistant; Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsPseudomonas Infectionsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenemsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPseudomonas aeruginosaTertiary Care CentersAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenems

Identifiers

PMID36705229
PMCPMC9446506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.