ArticleJNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association2022
Positive Bacterial Culture among Suspected Orthopedic Infections in a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.
Article in JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bridging the Diagnostic Gap: Enhancing Orthopedic Infection Management through Laboratory Diagnostics in Nepal.JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: A hospital-based investigation of bacteriological isolates helps to identify common causative bacteria and their antibiotic sensitivity patterns. This helps in formulating presumptive antibiotic therapy and in reducing antibiotic misuse. The aim of this study was to find out the prevalence of positive bacterial culture isolates among suspected orthopaedic infections in a tertiary care centre. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted from the electronic data record of the Department of Microbiology of a tertiary care centre from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2021. The study was conducted following ethical approval from the Institutional Review Committee (Reference number: IRC-2021-11-09-1). Culture reports of suspected orthopaedic infections were evaluated, and those with missing data were excluded. A convenience sampling method was used. Point estimate and 95% Confidence Interval were calculated. Results: Out of 6201 specimens, positive bacterial culture were found in 2957 (47.69%) (46.45-48.93, 95% Confidence Interval). Among them, 1561 (56.01%) were gram-negative organisms and 677 (24.29%) were gram-positive. A total of 2787 (94.25%) were wound/pus swab cultures and 170 (5.74%) were tissue cultures. Conclusions: The prevalence of positive bacterial culture among suspected orthopaedic infections was lower than in other international studies. Among bacteriological isolates, gram-negative organisms are more than gram-positive organisms. Keywords: culture techniques; infections; microbial sensitivity tests; prevalence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.