Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36704960›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2023

Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants during two outbreaks from March to May 2022 in Quzhou, China.

Zhiying Yin, Quanjun Fang, Tingcui Wen, Canjie Zheng, Canya Fu, Shuangqing Wang, Junji Li, Xiaoying Gong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhiying YinDepartment of Immunity, Quzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Quzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7678-5989
Quanjun FangDepartment of Immunity, Quzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Quzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Tingcui WenSchool of Public Health, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Canjie ZhengDepartment of Immunity, Quzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Quzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8507-1101
Canya FuSchool of Public Health, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Shuangqing WangDepartment of Immunity, Quzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Quzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Junji LiDepartment of Immunity, Quzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Quzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Xiaoying GongDepartment of Immunity, Quzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Quzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Taiwan Centers for Disease Control · TWZhejiang Chinese Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Limited data are available on the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines used in China in real-world outbreaks - especially against Omicron variants in vaccinated individuals. Two outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants - the first involving the sub-lineage BA.2 and the second the BA.1 variant - occurred in Quzhou. Infected people and their close contacts were divided according to vaccination status: unvaccinated, partially vaccinated, fully vaccinated, and boosted. The Cox proportional-hazard regression model was used to estimate the evolving hazard for vaccinated individuals after their first immunization. 138 people had been infected with the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 variant and 13 with the BA.1 variant. Of the 151 infections, 99.34% (150/151) were mild or asymptomatic and 90.07% (136/151) were vaccine breakthrough cases. The total vaccine effectiveness (VE) of partial, full, and booster vaccinations during the two outbreaks was 47.4% (95%CI: 0-93.1%), 28.9% (95%CI: 0-60.2%), and 27.5% (95%CI: 0-58.3%). The VE of booster vaccination against the Omicron BA.1 variant was higher than that for the BA.2 variant. The cumulative hazard began to increase 220 days after the first immunization. The transmissibility of the Omicron BA.2 variant as for BA.1 did not increase in vaccinated individuals; booster vaccination after a primary course substantially increased protection. Our study found that the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant caused less severe illness and that the VE of boosters against the Omicron variant was less than 30%. Timely administration of the booster dose was important, especially for individuals aged over 80 years old.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAged, 80 and overChinaDisease OutbreaksHumansSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19 vaccinesoutbreakSARS-CoV-2 Omicron variantsvaccine effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID36704960
PMCPMC10012893
OpenAlexW4318214505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.