Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36704957›Full record

ReviewProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine2023

Magnetically steerable catheters: State of the art review.

Chayabhan Limpabandhu, Yihua Hu, Hongliang Ren, Wenzhan Song, Zion Tsz Ho Tse

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chayabhan LimpabandhuSchool of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6560-8768
Yihua HuDepartment of Electronic Engineering, University of York, York, UK.
Hongliang RenDepartment of Electronic Engineering, University of York, York, UK.
Wenzhan SongDepartment of Electronic Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Zion Tsz Ho TseSchool of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetically steerable catheters (MSCs) have caught the interest of researchers due to their various potential uses in clinical applications, for example, minimally invasive surgery. Many significant advances in the design, implementation and analysis of MSCs have been accomplished in the last decade. This review concentrates on the configurations of current MSCs with an in depth look at control of the device and the specific workspace. This review also evaluates MSCs and references possible future system designs and difficulties. The concept of magnetic manipulation is briefly presented. Then, by category, the MSC is introduced. Following that, a discussion of future works and challenges of the review systems is provided. The conclusions are finally addressed.

Indexed as

CathetersMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresEquipment Designcatheter navigationcatheter steeringMagnetic actuationmagnetic actuation cathetermagnetic steerable cathetersteerable catheter

Identifiers

PMID36704957
PMCPMC10052423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.