ReviewChronic respiratory disease
Australian airway clearance services for adults with chronic lung conditions: A national survey.
Review in Chronic respiratory disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Practice of airway clearance in critically ill patients: a cross-sectional survey of respiratory therapists and physiotherapists in China.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Airway clearance techniques for people with acute exacerbation of COPD: a scoping review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025Article
- Physiotherapy-led, community-based airway clearance services for people with chronic lung conditions: a retrospective descriptive evaluation of an existing model of care.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhysiotherapy-led airway clearance interventions are indicated for some people with chronic lung conditions. This study describes Australian clinical models for the provision of adult airway clearance services.
methodsThis cross-sectional national study recruited public and private health care providers (excluding cystic fibrosis-specific services) identified by a review of websites. Providers were invited to complete an electronic 61-item survey with questions about airway clearance service context, referral demographics, service provision and program metrics. Data were reported descriptively with differences between metropolitan and non-metropolitan services explored with chi-square tests.
resultsBetween October-December 2019, the survey was disseminated to 131 providers with 91 responses received (69% response rate; 87 (96%) public (34 metropolitan; 53 non-metropolitan) and 4 (4%) private). Intent (chronic condition self-management) and types of intervention provided (education, breathing techniques, exercise prescription) were common across all services. Geographic location was associated with differences in airway clearance service models (greater use of regular clinics, telephone/telehealth consultations and dedicated cardiorespiratory physiotherapists in metropolitan locations versus clients incurring service and device provision costs in non-metropolitan regions).
conclusionsWhile similarities in airway clearance interventions exist, differences in service models may disadvantage people living with chronic lung conditions, especially in non-metropolitan regions of Australia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.