Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36704845›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2023

Gestational weight gain adequacy and intrapartum oxytocin and cesarean section use: Observational population-based study in France.

Melissa Amyx, Jennifer Zeitlin, Béatrice Blondel, Camille Le Ray

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Melissa AmyxObstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Center for Research on Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité (CRESS), INSERM, INRA, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4660-7716
Jennifer ZeitlinObstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Center for Research on Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité (CRESS), INSERM, INRA, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Béatrice BlondelObstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Center for Research on Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité (CRESS), INSERM, INRA, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9367-8317
Camille Le RayObstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Center for Research on Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité (CRESS), INSERM, INRA, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Inserm · FR

Funding

French Ministry of Health (Direction de la Recherche, des Études, de l'Évaluation et des Statistiques [DREES], Direction Générale de la Santé [DGS] and Direction Générale de l'Organisation des Soins [DGOS])Inserm-NICHD agreementSanté Publique France
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionResearch on maternal prepregnancy weight suggests adiposity is associated with dysfunctional labor, but knowledge about how gestational weight gain (GWG) affects labor is sparse. Our objective was to evaluate associations between GWG adequacy and intrapartum obstetric interventions (oxytocin administration; cesarean section) necessitated by labor dysfunction. MATERIAL AND

methodsUsing national, population-based French National Perinatal Survey 2016 data, we included term cephalic singleton pregnancies involving trial of labor (n = 9724). For the intrapartum oxytocin administration analysis, we included only women with spontaneous labor (n = 7352). GWG was calculated as the difference between end of pregnancy and prepregnancy weight (both self-reported) and categorized as insufficient, adequate (reference group), or excessive by prepregnancy body mass index (BMI; underweight <18.5, normal weight 18.5-24.9, overweight 25-29.9, obese ≥30 kg/m

resultsGWG adequacy was associated with oxytocin use among under/normal weight women (primiparas: insufficient 57.3%, adequate 60.8%, excessive 65.0%, p = 0.014; multiparas: insufficient 27.2%, adequate 29.1%, excessive 36.2%, p < 0.001) and overweight primiparas (insufficient 56.0%, adequate 58.7%, excessive 72.5%, p = 0.002). In unadjusted and adjusted models, trends of increased odds of oxytocin administration among women with excessive GWG were found regardless of parity and prepregnancy BMI. Similarly, among under/normal weight women, GWG adequacy was associated with intrapartum cesarean section (primiparas: insufficient 10.7%, adequate 12.7%, excessive 15.3%, p = 0.014; multiparas: insufficient 3.1%, adequate 3.5%, excessive 6.3%, p < 0.001) with increased cesarean section among multiparas with excessive GWG persisting in adjusted models (adjusted odds ratio 1.9, 95% confidence interval 1.3-2.7). However, intrapartum cesarean section was reduced among multiparas with overweight and obese prepregnancy BMI and excessive GWG.

conclusionsExcessive GWG was associated with intrapartum oxytocin administration, regardless of parity or prepregnancy BMI, and cesarean section among women with under/normal weight prepregnancy BMI, providing evidence for benefits of healthy GWG for normal labor progression. Additional research is needed to verify our findings and understand differences by BMI.

Indexed as

Gestational Weight GainOverweightBody Mass IndexCesarean SectionFemaleHumansObesityOxytocinParityPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeWeight GainOxytocinbody mass indexgestational weight gainInstitute of Medicine guidelinesobstetric interventionspregnancyweight gain

Identifiers

PMID36704845
PMCPMC9951319
OpenAlexW4318203670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.