Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36704843›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2023

Accompanying patients in clinical oncology teams: Reported activities and perceived effects.

Marie-Pascale Pomey, Jesseca Paquette, Monica Iliescu-Nelea, Cécile Vialaron, Rim Mourad, Karine Bouchard, Louise Normandin, Marie-Andrée Côté, Mado Desforges, Pénélope Pomey-Carpentier and 14 more

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Accompanying patients in clinical oncology teams: Reported activities and perceived effects.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Marie-Pascale PomeyResearch Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montréal, Quebec, CA.ORCID 0000-0001-5180-8139
Jesseca PaquetteResearch Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montréal, Quebec, CA.ORCID 0000-0003-0361-1440
Monica Iliescu-NeleaResearch Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montréal, Quebec, CA.
Cécile VialaronResearch Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montréal, Quebec, CA.
Rim MouradResearch Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montréal, Quebec, CA.
Karine BouchardCentre Hospitalier Universitaire-CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Louise NormandinResearch Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montréal, Quebec, CA.
Marie-Andrée CôtéResearch Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montréal, Quebec, CA.
Mado DesforgesResearch Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montréal, Quebec, CA.
Pénélope Pomey-CarpentierResearch Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montréal, Quebec, CA.
Israël FortinCentre Intégré Universitaire de santé et services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de Montréal, Hôpital de Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Isabelle GanacheInstitut national d'excellence en santé et services sociaux (INESSS), Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Catherine RégisUniversité de Montréal-Faculté de Droit, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Zeev RosbergerGerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital & McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Danielle CharpentierCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Lynda BélangerCentre Hospitalier Universitaire-CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Michel DorvalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire-CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Djahanchah P GhadiriDepartment of management, HEC Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Mélanie Lavoie-TremblayFaculté des sciences infirmières, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Antoine BoivinResearch Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montréal, Quebec, CA.
Jean-François PelletierCentre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de la Montérégie-Ouest, St-Hubert, Québec, Canada.
Nicolas FernandezDepartment of Family and Emergency Medicine, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3840-2641
Alain M DaninoResearch Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montréal, Quebec, CA.
Michèle de GuiseInstitut national d'excellence en santé et services sociaux (INESSS), Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSince 2018, four establishments in Quebec, Canada, have decided to implement the PAROLE-Onco programme, which introduced accompanying patients (APs) in healthcare teams to improve the experience of cancer patients. APs are patient advisors who have had a cancer treatment experience and who conduct consultations to complement the service offered by providing emotional, informational and educational support to patients undergoing treatments (e.g., radiotherapy, chemotherapy, surgery), mostly for breast cancer. We aimed to explore the evolution of APs' perspectives regarding their activities within the clinical oncology teams as well as the perceived effects of their intervention with patients, the clinical team and themselves.

methodsA qualitative study based on semistructured interviews and focus groups was conducted with APs at the beginning of their intervention (T1) and 2 years afterwards (T2). The themes discussed were APs' activities and the perceived effects of their interventions on themselves, on the patients and on the clinical team.

resultsIn total, 20 APs were interviewed. In T2, APs' activities shifted from listening and sharing experiences to empowering patients by helping them become partners in their care and felt generally more integrated into the clinical team. APs help patients feel understood and supported, alleviate stress and become partners in the care they receive. They also alleviate the clinical team's workload by offering a complementary service through emotional support, which, according to them, helps patients feel calmer and more prepared for their appointments with healthcare professionals. They communicate additional information about their patients' health journey, which makes the appointment more efficient for healthcare professionals. When APs accompany patients, they feel as if they can make a difference in patients' lives. Their activities are perceived by some as an opportunity to give back but also as a way of giving meaning to their own experience, in turn serving as a learning experience.

conclusionBy mobilizing their experiential knowledge, APs provide emotional, informational, cognitive and navigational support, which allows patients to be more empowered in their care and which complements professionals' scientific knowledge, thereby helping to refine their sensitivity to the patients' experiences. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Two patient-researchers have contributed to the study design, the conduct of the study, the data analysis and interpretation, as well as in the preparation and writing of this manuscript.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMedical OncologyPatientsQualitative Researchaccompanying patientsclinical teamoncologypatient advisorpatient care experiencepeer support

Identifiers

PMID36704843
PMCPMC10010089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.