Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36704662›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2023

Single Cone Obturation versus Cold Lateral Compaction Techniques with Bioceramic and Resin Sealers: Quality of Obturation and Push-Out Bond Strength.

Ahmad Nouroloyouni, Vahid Samadi, Amin Salem Milani, Sara Noorolouny, Haleh Valizadeh-Haghi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of dentistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Molecular Identification ofJournal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran) · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ahmad NouroloyouniDepartment of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3016-4861
Vahid SamadiDepartment of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1943-7136
Amin Salem MilaniDepartment of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0024-2494
Sara NoorolounyDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5806-0482
Haleh Valizadeh-HaghiDepartment of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9501-4293

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study compared the obturation quality and push-out bond strength of single cone obturation (SCO) and cold lateral compaction (CLC) with AH-Plus and Sure Seal Root (SSR). Materials and Methods: This in vitro experimental study was conducted on 88 single-rootedsingle-canal teeth with straight roots that were randomly divided into four groups ( Results: The PBS was significantly higher in the LSS group than LAH and SAH groups, and also in the SSS group than the SAH group in all sections. The PBS in the LSS group was significantly higher than SSS in the coronal and middle thirds. Voids were significantly lower in LAH than in the SAH group in all sections. In LSS, voids in the coronal third were significantly lower than in LAH. In the middle third, voids in SSS were significantly lower than in SAH. The groups had no significant difference in the mode of failure ( Conclusion: SSR showed higher PBS and less voids than AH-Plus. High PBS of the CLC/SSR group showed that CLC should still be preferred to SCO, and in the case of using SCO, SSR should be preferred to AH-Plus.

Identifiers

PMID36704662
PMCPMC9873427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.