Observational studyInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2023
Real-World Evidence on the Diagnostic and Clinical Characteristics of Asthma in Japanese Patients with COPD: The ACO Japan Cohort Study.
Observational study in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Triple Therapy with Budesonide/Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Fumarate Dihydrate versus Dual Therapies for Patients with COPD and Phenotypic Features of Asthma: A Pooled Post Hoc Analysis of KRONOS and ETHOS.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2024Trial
- Comorbid asthma - occurrence and associations with patient-related outcomes in COPD: a cohort study.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2027Article
- Inhaled Targeted Nano-Drug Delivery Systems for COPD: Precision Solutions to Clinical Barriers.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Potential of the Advanced Lung Cancer Inflammation Index as a Risk Marker for Asthma-Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Overlap Syndrome and COPD: Evidence from NHANES 2007-2018.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025Article
- Prognostic value of the relative neutrophil-monocyte-to-lymphocyte-albumin ratio in chronic lower respiratory diseases: a multicenter retrospective analysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Serum Derivatives-Reactive Oxygen Metabolite Levels as a Marker of Clinical Conditions in Patients with Bronchial Asthma, COPD, or Asthma-COPD Overlap: A Prospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Real-World Treatment Patterns and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Japan: The REMIND Study.Advances in therapy · 2024Article
- Increased Risk of Severe Cardiovascular Events Following Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Results of the EXACOS-CV Study in Japan.Advances in therapy · 2024Article
- Differential Clinical Significance of FENOJournal of asthma and allergy · 2024Article
- Underdiagnosis of COPD: The Japan COPD Real-World Data Epidemiological (CORE) Study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The ACO Japan Cohort Study, a multicenter observational study, investigated the proportion of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who met the Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS) asthma-COPD overlap (ACO) diagnostic criteria, characteristics of ACO and non-ACO patients, and the patient transitions between ACO/non-ACO diagnosis over 2 years. Patients and Methods: Patients with COPD were consecutively enrolled between June and December 2018 and followed up continuously for 2 years. All participating study sites were medical institutions where respiratory specialists routinely conducted medical examinations/tests required for ACO diagnosis. Results: Among 708 patients with COPD, 101 (14.3%), 118 (16.7%), and 125 (17.7%) were diagnosed with ACO at registration, 1 year, and 2 years, respectively. In total, 22.6% of patients lacked the data necessary for ACO diagnosis throughout the 2 years. Among patients who had the necessary data for ACO diagnosis, 24.7% were diagnosed with ACO at 2 years. More ACO patients had moderate or severe exacerbations in the past year than non-ACO patients at registration (15.8% vs 6.3%, p = 0.049) and 1 year (19.4% vs 7.6%, p = 0.025). ACO patients had a greater decrease in mean forced expiratory volume in one second over 2 years than non-ACO patients (-92.0 vs 43.4 mL). Among patients diagnosed with ACO at registration, 21.4% transitioned to non-ACO after 1 year. Conversely, almost all non-ACO patients at registration remained non-ACO after 1 year. Conclusion: COPD patients with ACO determined by the JRS criteria had a high risk of exacerbations and a rapid decline in respiratory function, indicating that the JRS criteria for ACO are useful for identifying high-risk COPD patients. Testing necessary for ACO diagnosis is insufficiently performed even in real-world clinical practice of COPD specialists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.