ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Success rates, challenges and troubleshooting of left bundle branch area pacing as a cardiac resynchronization therapy for treating patients with heart failure.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05985408 (Left Ventricular Septal Pacing Based Rescue CRT Versus Right Ventricular Apical Pacing Based CRT for Chronic Heart Failure), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Left Ventricular Septal Pacing Based Rescue CRT Versus Right Ventricular Apical Pacing Based CRT for Chronic Heart Failure: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electrophysiologic Assessment of the Successful Left Bundle Branch Pacing Using the Standardized Criteria.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2026Article
- Resynchronisation efficacy of pacing strategies depends on the assessment metric: a computational study.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Article
- The Integral Role of Cardiac Imaging in the Electrophysiology Field.The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management · 2025Review
- Initial Experience With Implantation Left Bundle Branch Pacing Leads Without a Dedicated Three-Dimensional Sheath.Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE · 2025Article
- Learning Curve for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Lead Implantation.The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management · 2025Article
- Conduction system pacing in heart failure: Time for a paradigm shift?Heart failure reviews · 2025Review
- Left bundle branch pacing cardiac resynchronization therapyWorld journal of cardiology · 2025Article
- High-resolution 3D visualization of human hearts with emphases on the cardiac conduction system components-a new platform for medical education, mix/virtual reality, computational simulation.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Right ventriculography to guide left bundle branch pacing in pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: a novel case report.European heart journal. Case reports · 2024Article
- Left Atrium Reverse Remodeling in Fusion CRT Pacing: Implications in Cardiac Resynchronization Response and Atrial Fibrillation Incidence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Conduction System Pacing: Hope, Challenges, and the Journey Forward.Current cardiology reports · 2024Review
- Comparative cost analysis of implanting devices in different cardiac resynchronization therapeutic strategies.Clinical cardiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an important treatment of heart failure patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and asynchrony of cardiac electromechanical activity. Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBaP) is a novel physiological pacing modality that appears to be an effective method for CRT. LBBaP has several advantages over the traditional biventricular-CRT (BiV-CRT), including a low and stable pacing capture threshold, a high success rate of implantation, a short learning curve, and high economic feasibility. However, LBBaP is not suitable for all heart failure patients needing a CRT and the success rates of LBBaP in heart failure patients is lower because of myocardial fibrosis, non-specific intraventricular conduction disturbance (IVCD), enlargement of the right atrium or right ventricle, etc. In this literature review, we summarize the success rates, challenges, and troubleshooting of LBBaP in heart failure patients needing a CRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.