ArticleIranian endodontic journal2020
Bacterial Leakage of Four Endodontic Sealers Using Fresh Human Saliva.
Article in Iranian endodontic journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Bacterial leakage plays a considerable role in endodontic related failures. The aim of this study was to compare the bacterial leakage of bioceramic (including Well Root ST and MTA Fillapex) and resin-based root canal sealers (naming AH-Plus and AdSeal). Methods and Materials: Sixty-eight maxillary central incisors were included in this experimental study. These were randomly allocated into four experimental groups, which were obturated with gutta-percha and four different sealers ( Results: Bacterial leakage was observed in 33.3% of the samples in Well Root ST, 40% in AH-Plus group, 53.3% in AdSeal group, and 66.6% in MTA Fillapex group. The difference between the Well Root ST and MTA Fillapex groups was significant ( Conclusion: The results of this
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.