ArticleIranian endodontic journal2021
The Accuracy of Three Apex Locators in Determining the Location of Strip Root Perforation in Different Environments.
Article in Iranian endodontic journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The comparison of strip perforation repair using proroot MTA and calcium silicate-based sealer with cold hydraulic technique; bacterial leakage and micro-CT studies.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Accuracy of electronic apex locators during root canal therapy in dentistry.Journal of dental sciences · 2025Article
- Advanced Endodontic Techniques for Treating Root Perforation in a Hypertaurodont Molar: A Case Report.Iranian endodontic journal · 2025Article
- Factors influencing the accuracy of electronic apex locators: A scoping review.Dental research journal · 2025Review
- Comparative Accuracy and Reliability of Three Electronic Apex Locators in Determining the Apical Constriction of Molar Canals: A Micro-CT Evaluation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of Root ZX (J. Morita USA, Inc., Irvine, CA, USA), Raypex 6 (VDW, Munich, Germany) and Methods and Materials: This Results: Most accurate measurements were seen in CHX environment for all three EALs. Root ZX mini in CHX environment showed most accurate reading but no significant difference was observed in three EALs in CHX environment. There was no significant difference between different environment in Root ZX mini ( Conclusion: Based on this
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.