Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36704394›Full record

ArticleIranian endodontic journal2021

Multiple Microsurgery Intervention with Apicoectomy Guidance in Single Session: A Case Report.

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian endodontic journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

0 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this manuscript is to describe and discuss the advantages and obstacles of using a guided implant system adapted for endodontic microsurgery in the execution of a case with indication of multiple endodontic microsurgery intervention in a single appointment. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were aligned and processed with the planning software, complementing the Straumann® guided instruments. The drill handles of the system employed directed milling cutters and guided drills based on the sleeve-in-sleeve concept used in the osteotomy and apical resection of teeth #13, #14, #23 and #24. The root-ends were retro-prepared and sealed with putty bioceramic sealer. The patient was completely asymptomatic at the 12 months follow up visit and CBCT revealed complete tissue healing of the involved teeth. The protocol demonstrated to be reliable and reproducible. Its applicability can be extended to other anatomical complex scenarios. The reproducibility of the technique would encourage the maintenance of teeth in patients with indication to multiple endodontic surgery and permitted the conclusion of this case with precision and comfort to both patient and operator.

Indexed as

ApicoectomyEndodontically-treated TeethPeriapical Periodontitis

Identifiers

PMID36704394
PMCPMC9735248
OpenAlexW3196607474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.