ArticleIranian endodontic journal2021
Survival Rates of Unrestorable Fracture of Endodontically Treated Anterior Teeth Restored with Resin Composites or Crowns: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Iranian endodontic journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Survival Outcomes of Crowns with and without Repaired Endodontic Access Cavities: A Retrospective Propensity Score Matching Study.European endodontic journal · 2025Article
- Survival and Success Rate of Restoration Post Endodontic Treatment.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry · 2025Review
- Success of Nonsurgical Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth with Complex Restorative/Prosthodontic Treatments: A Retrospective Study.Iranian endodontic journal · 2024Article
- Influence of Different Post-endodontic Restorations on the Survival Rate Against Fracture of Endodontically Treated Anterior Teeth Affected by Cervical Lesions with Pulpal Involvement: A Retrospective Clinical Study.European endodontic journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Current guidelines for the restoration of endodontically treated anterior teeth (ETT) are based on laboratory results and insufficient clinical findings. This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare the survival rates of ETT with unrestorable fracture restored with direct resin composite (DRC) or full coverage crown (FCC), and identify predisposing factors. Methods and Materials: Dental records and radiographs of ETT restored with DRC or FCC were collected from the dental charts of patients who received endodontic treatments and attended recall(s) from 2007 to 2019. Clinical/radiographic data and incidence of unrestorable fracture were recorded. Survival rates of ETT with unrestorable fracture treated with DRC and FCC were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test, whereas predisposing factors were identified using Cox proportional-hazard model. Moreover, the survival rates of maxillary ETT with different sites of remaining cervical tooth structure were analyzed. Results: A total of 263 ETT with 157 DRC and 106 FCC were recruited. At an average recall period of 38 months, the survival rate of ETT restored with FCC was significantly higher (99.1%) than DRC (90.4%) ( Conclusion: Based on the findings of the current cohort study, the survival rate of ETT with unrestorable fracture restored with FCC was significantly higher than DRC. However, ETT without predisposing factors were not susceptible to fracture and could be successfully restored with DRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.