ArticleFrontiers in genetics2022
Identification of molecular subtypes and a prognostic signature based on chromatin regulators related genes in prostate cancer.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Revealing the Impact of Mono(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate (MEHP) on Prostate Cancer Based on Network Toxicology and Molecular Docking Approaches.Journal of applied toxicology : JAT · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The clinical and molecular phenotypes of prostate cancer (PCa) exhibit substantial heterogeneity, ranging from indolent to metastatic disease. In this study, we aimed to identify PCa subtypes and construct a gene signature that can predict the recurrence-free survival (RFS) of PCa patients based on chromatin regulators genes (CRGs). Strikingly, we identified two heterogeneous subtypes with distinct clinical and molecular characteristics. Furthermore, by performing differential analysis between the two CRGs subtypes, we successfully constructed a gene signature to predict PCa prognosis. The signature, comprising four genes (MXD3, SSTR1, AMH and PPFIA2), was utilized to classify PCa patients into two risk groups; the high-risk group was characterized by poor prognosis and more aggressive clinical features. Moreover, we investigated the immune profile, mutation landscape and molecular pathways in each of the groups. Additionally, drug-susceptibility testing was performed to explore sensitive drugs for high-risk patients. Furthermore, we found that MXD3 downregulation suppressed the proliferation of PCa cell lines
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.