ArticleIranian endodontic journal2020
Different Application Methods for Endoseal MTA Sealer: A Comparative Study.
Article in Iranian endodontic journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Microscopic evaluation of microleakage in retrograde filling materials using conventional and ultrasonic techniques.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Enhancing Coronal Adaptation of Root Canal Fillings with a Modified Single-Cone Obturation Technique: Two Case Reports.Iranian endodontic journal · 2024Article
- Effect of Obturation Techniques on the Quality of Root Canal Fillings: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis ofIranian endodontic journal · 2024Review
- Evaluation of dimensional changes in EndoSeal mineral trioxide aggregate and AH Plus sealers using micro-computed tomography imaging.Dental research journal · 2024Article
- Comparison of bacterial microleakage of three bioactive endodontic sealers in simulated underwater diving and aviation conditions.BMC oral health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of present Methods and Materials: Thirty-six extracted human anterior single-root teeth were prepared and assigned to 3 groups: Group 1: EMS group was Endoseal MTA+ single-cone; Group 2: EMSU group was Endoseal MTA+ single-cone with ultrasonic activation; and Group 3: LC group was Endoseal MTA+ lateral condensation technique. Teeth were sectioned transversely in coronal, middle and apical of the teeth and the existence of voids and their areas in the slices were measured and scored under a dental microscope. One-way analysis of variance and Post Hoc test were used for statistical analysis and also to detect any significance ( Results: EMS group showed significantly more void area than lateral compaction group ( Conclusion: Endoseal MTA as a premixed calcium silicate sealer has a better performance when used with gutta-percha cone-mediated ultrasonic activation, so we suggest gentle ultrasonic activation for applying Endoseal MTA in the clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.