Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36704252›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2023

Does wing use and disuse cause behavioural and musculoskeletal changes in domestic fowl (

Renée C Garant, Bret W Tobalske, Neila Ben Sassi, Nienke van Staaveren, Dan Tulpan, Tina Widowski, Donald R Powers, Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Renée C GarantDepartment of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1.
Bret W TobalskeDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, MT 59812, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5739-6099
Neila Ben SassiDepartment of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1.
Nienke van StaaverenDepartment of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1.ORCID 0000-0003-3401-5553
Dan TulpanDepartment of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1.
Tina WidowskiDepartment of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3274-7558
Donald R PowersDepartment of Biology, George Fox University, 414 N Meridian Street, Newberg, OR 97132, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1126-7141
Alexandra Harlander-MatauschekDepartment of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1.ORCID 0000-0001-6869-5281
University of Guelph · CAGeorge Fox University · USUniversité Bourgogne Franche-Comté · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Domestic chickens may live in environments which restrict wing muscle usage. Notably, reduced wing activity and accompanying muscle weakness are hypothesized risk factors for keel bone fractures and deviations. We used radio-frequency identification (RFID) to measure duration spent at elevated resources (feeders, nest-boxes), ultrasonography to measure muscle thickness (breast and lower leg) changes, radiography and palpation to determine fractures and deviations, respectively, following no, partial (one-sided wing sling) and full (cage) immobilization in white- and brown-feathered birds. We hypothesized partially immobilized hens would reduce elevated resource usage and that both immobilization groups would show decreased pectoralis thickness (disuse) and increased prevalence of fractures and deviations. Elevated nest-box usage was 42% lower following five weeks of partial immobilization for brown-feathered hens but no change in resource usage in white-feathered birds was observed. Fully immobilized, white-feathered hens showed a 17% reduction in pectoralis thickness, while the brown-feathered counterparts showed no change. Lastly, fractures and deviations were not affected in either strain or form of wing immobilization; however, overall low numbers of birds presented with these issues. Altogether, this study shows a profound difference between white- and brown-feathered hens in response to wing immobilization and associated muscle physiology.

Indexed as

flapping flightkeel bone damagelimb immobilizationmuscle adaptationsresource use

Identifiers

PMID36704252
PMCPMC9874265
OpenAlexW4318043871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.