Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36704233›Full record

ArticleCommunicative & integrative biology2023

Dual localization of the carboxy-terminal tail of GLR3.3 in sieve element-companion cell complex.

Qian Wu, Mengjiao Chen, Archana Kumari

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communicative & integrative biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 100% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Qian WuShenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4521-9036
Mengjiao ChenNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Archana KumariPlant Molecular Biology Unit, Division of Biochemical Sciences, CSIR-National Chemical Laboratory, Pune, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7510-2181
Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen · CNNanjing Agricultural University · CNNational Chemical Laboratory · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glutamate receptor-like (GLR) 3.3 and 3.6 proteins are required for mediating wound-induced leaf-to-leaf electrical signaling. In the previous study, we found that the carboxy-terminal tail of GLR3.3 contains key residues that are indispensable for its action in electrical signaling. In the present work, we generated plants that expressed the truncated C-tail fraction of GLR3.3. To our expectation, the truncated C-tail itself was not functional in propagating leaf-to-leaf signals. However, we identified that the C-tail-mVENUS fusion proteins had dual localization patterns in sieve elements and companion cells. In companion cells, the fusion proteins overlapped largely with the nucleus. We speculated that a possible nuclear localization signal is present in the C-tail of GLR3.3, paralleling the C-tails of the ionotropic glutamate receptors in animal cells. Our further findings on the C-tail of GLR3.3 open up new possibilities for the regulatory roles of the C-tails to GLR proteins.

Indexed as

companion cellelectrical signalingglutamate receptorsieve elementwound signaling

Identifiers

PMID36704233
PMCPMC9872950
OpenAlexW4317717530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.