ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022
Integrated diagnosis and time-series sensitivity evaluation of nutrient deficiencies in medicinal plant (
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating hyperspectral reflectance and machine learning for rapid diagnosis of nutrient deficiencies in greenhouse chrysanthemum leaves.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Modular, On-Site Solutions with Lightweight Anomaly Detection for Sustainable Nutrient Management in Agriculture.ACS ES&T engineering · 2026Article
- Prediction of growth parameters in the medicinal plantFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Advancing medicinal plant agriculture: integrating technology and precision agriculture for sustainability.PeerJ · 2025Review
- Article
- Effects of Biochar and Straw Amendment on Soil Fertility and Microbial Communities in Paddy Soils.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nitrogen(N), phosphorus(P), and potassium(K) are essential elements that are highly deficient during plant growth. Existing diagnostic methods are not suitable for rapid diagnosis of large-scale planting areas. Near-ground remote sensing technology based on unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and sensor is often applied to crop growth condition monitoring and agricultural management. It has been proven to be used for monitoring plant N, P, and K content. However, its integrated diagnostic model has been less studied. Methods: In this study, we collected UAV multispectral images of Ligusticum chuanxiong Hort. in different periods of nutritional stress and constructed recognition models with different heights and algorithms. The optimal model variables were selected, and the effects of different sampling heights and modeling algorithms on the model efficiency under the time span were evaluated. At the same time, we evaluated the timeliness of the model based on leaf element content determination and SPAD. It was also validated in field crop production. Results: The results showed that the LR algorithm's model had optimal performance at all periods and flight altitudes. The optimal accuracy of N-deficient plants identification reached 100%, P/K-deficient plants reached 92.4%, and normal plants reached 91.7%. The results of UAV multispectral diagnosis, chemical diagnosis, and SPAD value diagnosis were consistent in the diagnosis of N deficiency, and the diagnosis of P and K deficiency was slightly lagging behind that of chemical diagnosis. Conclusions: This research uses UAV remote sensing technology to establish an efficient, fast, and timely nutritional diagnosis method for L. Chuanxiong, which is applied in production. Meanwhile, the standardized production of medicinal plant resources provides new solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.