Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36704161›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Low-volume precision spray for plant pest control using profile variable rate spraying and ultrasonic detection.

Yulong Nan, Huichun Zhang, Jiaqiang Zheng, Kunqi Yang, Yufeng Ge

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yulong NanCollege of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China.
Huichun ZhangCollege of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China.
Jiaqiang ZhengCollege of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China.
Kunqi YangCollege of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China.
Yufeng GeDepartment of Biological Systems Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States.
Nanjing Forestry University · CNUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln · USYancheng Institute of Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spraying chemical pesticides is one of the important means to control plant pest, and the profile variable spraying is an important technology to achieve precise pesticide application. A profiling tracking control method and an improved algorithm based on CMAC-PID (Cerebellar Model Articulation Controller- Potential Induced Degradation) were proposed in the paper. The test results of the sprayer profiling tracking of the tree canopies showed that the profiling control system using the improved algorithm had significantly better dynamic tracking performance, and the overall mean tracking error was reduced by 35.0%, compared with the traditional CMAC-PID. A spray flow calculation method based on tree canopy volume and leaf area density was proposed. Outdoor testing of the profile variable spraying and conventional spraying was carried out. There was no significant difference between the two spraying methods in terms of droplet coverage, VMD (Volume Median Diameter), NMD (Number Median Diameter), spray quality parameter and relative span coefficient, as well as droplet deposition density. The spray coefficient of variation was reduced by 25.9% and 21.9% inside and outside the tree canopy, respectively. The mean value of the ground deposition coverage of the profile variable spraying and the traditional spray was 13.0% and 33.2%, respectively, indicating a significant impact on the ground droplet deposition coverage by the two spraying methods. The spray flow rate of the profile variable spraying could be decreased by 32.1% compared to the conventional spraying. Profile variable spraying would reduce the cost associated with pesticide use and environmental pollution.

Indexed as

precise pesticide applicationprofile variable rate sprayingprofiling controlsprayerultrasonic sensor

Identifiers

PMID36704161
PMCPMC9871065
OpenAlexW4315490056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.