ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2022
Choosing Wisely in pediatric healthcare: A narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Investigations for Bronchiolitis in Infants: An Overview of Reviews and Systematic Review of Primary Studies.Pediatric pulmonology · 2026Pooled it
- Enhancing parental health knowledge through digital knowledge mobilisation tools: a randomised controlled trial and qualitative study.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Trial
- Prioritising Recommendations for Conversion to Living Mode in the Australasian Bronchiolitis Guideline: A Modified Delphi Study.Clinical and public health guidelines · 2026Article
- The case for chewable tablets: reducing single-use plastic waste in pediatrics.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026Article
- Assessing the feasibility of shape-sensing robotic bronchoscopy mapping to lung nodules in pediatric patients.Journal of pediatric surgery · 2026Article
- Salivary Biomarkers in Pediatric Acute Appendicitis: Current Evidence and Future Directions.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Adherence to "Choosing Wisely" Recommendations in Pediatric Emergency Medicine.Annals of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Environmental Sustainability in the Outpatient Clinic Setting.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Review
- Assessment of Medical Test Overuse and Its Impact on Pediatric Emergency Department Outcomes in Upper Respiratory Tract Infections in a University Hospital in Lithuania.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Fever management in children and insights into fever of unknown origin: a survey among Italian pediatricians.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- Factors influencing health professionals' use of high-flow nasal cannula therapy for infants with bronchiolitis - A qualitative study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: It has been estimated that 20% of the tests and therapies currently prescribed in North America are likely unnecessary, add no value, and may even cause harm. The Choosing Wisely (CW) campaign was launched in 2012 in the US and Canada to limit the overuse of medical procedures in adult and pediatric healthcare, to avoid overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Methods: In this narrative review, we describe the birth and spread of the CW campaign all over the world, with emphasis on CW in pediatric healthcare. Results: To date, CW has spread to more than 25 countries and 80 organizations, with 700 recommendations published. The awareness of medication overuse also made its way into pediatrics. One year after the launch of the CW campaign, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the pediatric section of the Society of Hospital Medicine provided the first recommendations specifically aimed at pediatricians. Thereafter, many European pediatric societies also became active in the CW campaign and published specific top-5 recommendations, although there is not yet a common set of CW recommendations in Europe. Discussion: We reviewed the main pediatric CW recommendations in medical and surgical fields and discussed how the recommendations have been produced, published, and disseminated. We also analyzed whether and how the CW recommendations impacted pediatric medical practice. Furthermore, we highlighted the common obstacles in applying CW recommendations, such as pressure from patients and families, diagnostic uncertainty, and worries about legal problems. Finally, we highlighted the necessity to foster the CW culture, develop an implementation plan, and measure the results in terms of overuse decline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.