Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36704111›Full record

ArticleIranian endodontic journal2020

Amjad Abu Hasna, Rayana Duarte Khoury, Cassia Cestari Toia, Glaucia Beatriz Gonçalves, Flaviana Bombarda de Andrade, Cláudio Antonio Talge Carvalho, Carlos Henrique Ribeiro Camargo, Marcia Carneiro Valera

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian endodontic journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Comparative evaluation of antibacterial efficacy ofJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Endodontic irrigants from a comprehensive perspective.World journal of clinical cases · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. International journal of dentistry · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amjad Abu HasnaDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Endodontic Division, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Institute of Science and Technology, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rayana Duarte KhouryDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Endodontic Division, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Institute of Science and Technology, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Cassia Cestari ToiaDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Endodontic Division, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Institute of Science and Technology, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Glaucia Beatriz GonçalvesDepartment of Operative Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry of Bauru, University of São Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.
Flaviana Bombarda de AndradeDepartment of Operative Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry of Bauru, University of São Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.
Cláudio Antonio Talge CarvalhoDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Endodontic Division, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Institute of Science and Technology, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Carlos Henrique Ribeiro CamargoDepartment of Restorative Dental Sciences, University of Florida, UF; Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Marcia Carneiro ValeraDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Endodontic Division, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Institute of Science and Technology, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the Methods and Materials: Eighty human teeth were randomly divided into 5 groups ( Results: CFU/mL analysis showed that CH, NAC and NAC+PDT promoted greater antibacterial activity with statistically significant difference compared to saline solution and PDT ( Conclusions: Based on this

Indexed as

Confocal Laser Scanning MicroscopyEnterococus faecalisN-AcetylcysteinePhotodynamic TherapyScanning Electron Microscopy

Identifiers

PMID36704111
PMCPMC9709833
OpenAlexW3091875739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.