Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36704096›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2022

EEG Lempel-Ziv complexity varies with sleep stage, but does not seem to track dream experience.

Arnfinn Aamodt, André Sevenius Nilsen, Rune Markhus, Anikó Kusztor, Fatemeh HasanzadehMoghadam, Nils Kauppi, Benjamin Thürer, Johan Frederik Storm, Bjørn Erik Juel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The entropic brain today.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026
    Review
  3. Cognitive Processing and EEG Complexity.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. "Awe-scillations": EEG spectral and complexity representations of awe.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Arnfinn AamodtBrain Signalling Lab, Division of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
André Sevenius NilsenBrain Signalling Lab, Division of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Rune MarkhusNational Centre for Epilepsy, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Anikó KusztorBrain Signalling Lab, Division of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Fatemeh HasanzadehMoghadamBrain Signalling Lab, Division of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Nils KauppiBrain Signalling Lab, Division of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Benjamin ThürerBrain Signalling Lab, Division of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Johan Frederik StormBrain Signalling Lab, Division of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Bjørn Erik JuelBrain Signalling Lab, Division of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a recent electroencephalography (EEG) sleep study inspired by complexity theories of consciousness, we found that multi-channel signal diversity progressively decreased from wakefulness to slow wave sleep, but failed to find any significant difference between dreaming and non-dreaming awakenings within the same sleep stage (NREM2). However, we did find that multi-channel Lempel-Ziv complexity (LZC) measured over the posterior cortex increased with more perceptual ratings of NREM2 dream experience along a thought-perceptual axis. In this follow-up study, we re-tested our previous findings, using a slightly different approach. Partial sleep-deprivation was followed by evening sleep experiments, with repeated awakenings and immediate dream reports. Participants reported whether they had been dreaming, and were asked to rate how diverse, vivid, perceptual, and thought-like the contents of their dreams were. High density (64 channel) EEG was recorded throughout the experiment, and mean single-channel LZC was calculated for each 30 s sleep epoch. LZC progressively decreased with depth of non-REM sleep. Surprisingly, estimated marginal mean LZC was slightly higher for NREM1 than for wakefulness, but the difference did not remain significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons. We found no significant difference in LZC between dream and non-dream awakenings, nor any significant relationship between LZC and subjective ratings of dream experience, within the same sleep stage (NREM2). The failure to reproduce our own previous finding of a positive correlation between posterior LZC and more perceptual dream experiences, or to find any other correlation between brain signal complexity and subjective experience within NREM2 sleep, raises the question of whether EEG LZC is really a reliable correlate of richness of experience as such, within the same sleep stage.

Indexed as

complexityconsciousnessdreamingEEGsleep

Identifiers

PMID36704096
PMCPMC9871639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.