Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36704081›Full record

ArticleIranian endodontic journal2022

Evaluation of Residual Debris and Smear layer After Root Canal Preparation by Three Different Methods: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study.

Nazanin Zargar, Mandana Naseri, Zeynab Gholizadeh, Pegah Mehrabinia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian endodontic journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nazanin ZargarDepartment of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. Tehran, Iran.
Mandana NaseriDepartment of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. Tehran, Iran.
Zeynab GholizadehDentist, Private Practice, Tehran, Iran.
Pegah MehrabiniaDepartment of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study investigated the amount of debris and smear layer remaining followed chemomechanical preparation using three systems: ProTaper Universal, reciprocating SafeSider, and hand K-Flexofiles with scanning electron microscope (SEM). Materials and Methods: Sixty-five mandibular molars with mesiobuccal canal curvature (25 to 40 Results: To assess the accumulation of debris, statistically significant differences were observed only in the coronal area among ProTaper Universal, SafeSider, K-Flexofile, and the control group. ( Conclusions: Based on the present

Indexed as

ProTaperRoot Canal PreparationSafeSiderScanning Electron MicroscopySmear Layer

Identifiers

PMID36704081
PMCPMC9869003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.