ArticleHealth information science and systems2023
Knowledge and data-driven prediction of organ failure in critical care patients.
Article in Health information science and systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving clinical decision support through interpretable machine learning and error handling in electronic health records.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in pancreatitis: A narrative review on advancing precision diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic strategies.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The early detection of organ failure mitigates the risk of post-intensive care syndrome and long-term functional impairment. The aim of this study is to predict organ failure in real-time for critical care patients based on a data-driven and knowledge-driven machine learning method (DKM) and provide explanations for the prediction by incorporating a medical knowledge graph. Methods: The cohort of this study was a subset of the 4,386 adult Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients from the MIMIC-III dataset collected between 2001 and 2012, and the primary outcome was the Delta Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. A real-time Delta SOFA score prediction model was developed with two key components: an improved deep learning temporal convolutional network (S-TCN) and a graph-embedding feature extraction method based on a medical knowledge graph. Entities and relations related to organ failure were extracted from the Unified Medical Language System to build the medical knowledge graph, and patient data were mapped onto the graph to extract the embeddings. We measured the performance of our DKM approach with cross-validation to avoid the formation of biased assessments. Results: An area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.973, a precision of 0.923, a NPV of 0.989, and an F1 score of 0.927 were achieved using the DKM approach, which significantly outperformed the baseline methods. Additionally, the performance remained stable following external validation on the eICU dataset, which consists of 2,816 admissions (AUC = 0.981, precision = 0.860, NPV = 0.984). Visualization of feature importance for the Delta SOFA score and their relationships on the basic clinical medical (BCM) knowledge graph provided a model explanation. Conclusion: The use of an improved TCN model and a medical knowledge graph led to substantial improvement in prediction accuracy, providing generalizability and an independent explanation for organ failure prediction in critical care patients. These findings show the potential of incorporating prior domain knowledge into machine learning models to inform care and service planning. Supplementary Information: The online version of this article contains supplementary material available 10.1007/s13755-023-00210-5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.